ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2014
Eliminating the human factor in office blood pressure measurement.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison Between Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements and Manual Office Blood Pressure Measurements-Implications in Individual Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current hypertension reports · 2021Pooled it
- Optimizing observer performance of clinic blood pressure measurement: a position statement from the Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group.Journal of hypertension · 2019Guideline
- Comparing Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings With Other Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement for Identifying Patients With Possible Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA internal medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Accuracy of abbreviated protocols for unattended automated office blood pressure measurements, a retrospective study.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Evaluation of the Omron HEM-907 automated blood pressure device: comparison with office and ambulatory blood pressure readings.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019Trial
- Improvement in Hypertension Control Among Adults Seen in Federally Qualified Health Center Clinics in the Stroke Belt: Implementing a Program with a Dashboard and Process Metrics.Health equity · 2023Article
- How Should We Measure and Deal with Office Blood Pressure in 2021?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Stress-Reducing Effects of Playing a Casual Video Game among Undergraduate Students.Trends in psychology · 2021Article
- [Optimizing observer performance of clinic blood Pressure measurement: a position statement from the Lancet Commission on Hypertension GroupOtimização do desempenho do observador na medição clínica da pressão arterial: posicionamento do Grupo daRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2020Article
- Effect of Education for Hypertensive Patients with Correctly Performed Self-Blood Pressure Monitoring (SBPM).Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Improving Hypertension Control in Primary Care With the Measure Accurately, Act Rapidly, and Partner With Patients Protocol.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2018Article
- Measure Accurately, Act Rapidly, and Partner With Patients (MAP) improves hypertension control in medically underserved patients: Care Coordination Institute and American Medical Association Hypertension Control Project Pilot Study results.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Article
- Can auscultatory blood pressure normative values be used for evaluation of oscillometric blood pressure in children?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2017Article
- Contributions to Hypertension Public Policy and Clinical Practice: A Review of Recent Reports.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2016Review
- William B. White Explains the Changes In the Way We Look at Blood Pressure: Which Numbers Matter Most-and Why Can They Be Deceptive?P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2016Article
- Prevalence of pseudoresistant hypertension due to inaccurate blood pressure measurement.Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : JASH · 2016Article
- Blood Pressure Measurement Modalities: A Primer for Busy Practitioners.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2016Article
- Impact of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring on Reclassification of Hypertension Prevalence and Control in Older People in Spain.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2015Article
- Reply to Dr Myers' commentary on the use of automated blood pressure machines in office blood pressure measurements.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Factors related to the physician/nurse and patient and their interaction are potential sources of error in manual office blood pressure (MOBP). The use of automated sphygmomanometers to record blood pressure (BP) with the patient alone reduces measurement error and minimizes anxiety-related increases in BP, thus eliminating the "white-coat" response. Comparative studies have shown the cut-point for a normal automated office BP (AOBP), awake ambulatory BP, and home BP (<135/85 mmHg) to be similar, providing the patient does not rest for a prolonged period before the first AOBP reading, as recommended for MOBP measurement. AOBP should now replace MOBP in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.