ArticleInvestigative genetics2014
DNA fingerprinting in botany: past, present, future.
Article in Investigative genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scalable medium-density genotyping platforms for cultivar identification, pedigree authentication, marker-assisted and genomic selection, and other applications in strawberry.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Development of KASP Markers for Carnation Germplasm (or Cultivar) Fingerprinting Based on Reduced-Representation Genome Sequencing Technology.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development of KASP molecular markers and construction of fingerprinting for cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) based on ddRAD-Seq.PloS one · 2026Article
- Development of KASP markers, SNP fingerprinting and population structure analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Development of KASP molecular markers and fingerprinting based on reduced representation genome sequencing of garlic.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Phenotypic and Genetic Stability of theGenes · 2025Article
- Molecular markers enhance substantially the distinctness of alfalfa varieties for registration and protection.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a minimal SNP genotyping panel for the differentiation of Cannabis sativa cultivars.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Biotechnological Phytocomplex ofPharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Development and Applications of Somatic Embryogenesis in Grapevine (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Genetic diversity analysis and DNA fingerprint construction of Zanthoxylum species based on SSR and iPBS markers.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Authentication of important medicinal herbal species through DNA-based molecular characterization.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2024Article
- Population Variation and Phylogeography of Cherry Blossom (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Construction of SNP fingerprints and genetic diversity analysis of radish (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Development of species-specific ISSR-derived SCAR marker for early discrimination between Cinnamomum verum and Cinnamomum cassia.Molecular biology reports · 2023Article
- Genotyping of Jujube (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Botanical Ingredient Forensics: Detection of Attempts to Deceive Commonly Used Analytical Methods for Authenticating Herbal Dietary and Food Ingredients and Supplements.Journal of natural products · 2023Review
- Micropropagation Protocol and Genetic Stability of theBiology · 2023Article
- A NovelPharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Almost three decades ago Alec Jeffreys published his seminal Nature papers on the use of minisatellite probes for DNA fingerprinting of humans (Jeffreys and colleagues Nature 1985, 314:67-73 and Nature 1985, 316:76-79). The new technology was soon adopted for many other organisms including plants, and when Hilde Nybom, Kurt Weising and Alec Jeffreys first met at the very First International Conference on DNA Fingerprinting in Berne, Switzerland, in 1990, everybody was enthusiastic about the novel method that allowed us for the first time to discriminate between humans, animals, plants and fungi on the individual level using DNA markers. A newsletter coined "Fingerprint News" was launched, T-shirts were sold, and the proceedings of the Berne conference filled a first book on "DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications". Four more conferences were about to follow, one on each continent, and Alec Jeffreys of course was invited to all of them. Since these early days, methodologies have undergone a rapid evolution and diversification. A multitude of techniques have been developed, optimized, and eventually abandoned when novel and more efficient and/or more reliable methods appeared. Despite some overlap between the lifetimes of the different technologies, three phases can be defined that coincide with major technological advances. Whereas the first phase of DNA fingerprinting ("the past") was dominated by restriction fragment analysis in conjunction with Southern blot hybridization, the advent of the PCR in the late 1980s gave way to the development of PCR-based single- or multi-locus profiling techniques in the second phase. Given that many routine applications of plant DNA fingerprinting still rely on PCR-based markers, we here refer to these methods as "DNA fingerprinting in the present", and include numerous examples in the present review. The beginning of the third phase actually dates back to 2005, when several novel, highly parallel DNA sequencing strategies were developed that increased the throughput over current Sanger sequencing technology 1000-fold and more. High-speed DNA sequencing was soon also exploited for DNA fingerprinting in plants, either in terms of facilitated marker development, or directly in the sense of "genotyping-by-sequencing". Whereas these novel approaches are applied at an ever increasing rate also in non-model species, they are still far from routine, and we therefore treat them here as "DNA fingerprinting in the future".
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.