Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24386438›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Comparison of the bacterial composition and structure in symptomatic and asymptomatic endodontic infections associated with root-filled teeth using pyrosequencing.

Annette Carola Anderson, Ali Al-Ahmad, Fadil Elamin, Daniel Jonas, Yousra Mirghani, Markus Schilhabel, Lamprini Karygianni, Elmar Hellwig, Ateequr Rehman

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prevalence of the GenusJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Annette Carola AndersonDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
Ali Al-AhmadDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
Fadil ElaminKhartoum Center for Research and Medical Training, Khartoum, Sudan.
Daniel JonasInstitute of Environmental Medicine and Hospital Hygiene, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
Yousra MirghaniKhartoum Center for Research and Medical Training, Khartoum, Sudan.
Markus SchilhabelInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Lamprini KarygianniDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
Elmar HellwigDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
Ateequr RehmanInstitute of Environmental Medicine and Hospital Hygiene, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residual microorganisms and/or re-infections are a major cause for root canal therapy failure. Understanding of the bacterial content could improve treatment protocols. Fifty samples from 25 symptomatic and 25 asymptomatic previously root-filled teeth were collected from Sudanese patients with periradicular lesions. Amplified 16S rRNA gene (V1-V2) variable regions were subjected to pyrosequencing (FLX 454) to determine the bacterial profile. Obtained quality-controlled sequences from forty samples were classified into 741 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 3% dissimilarity, 525 at 5% dissimilarity and 297 at 10% dissimilarity, approximately corresponding to species-, genus- and class levels. The most abundant phyla were: Firmicutes (29.9%), Proteobacteria (26.1%), Actinobacteria (22.72%), Bacteroidetes (13.31%) and Fusobacteria (4.55%). Symptomatic patients had more Firmicutes and Fusobacteria than asymptomatic patients, while asymptomatic patients showed more Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. Interaction of disease status and age was observed by two-way ANOSIM. Canonical correspondence analysis for age, tooth restoration and disease status showed a correlation of disease status with the composition and prevalence of different members of the microbial community. The pyrosequencing analysis revealed a distinctly higher diversity of the microbiota compared to earlier reports. The comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients showed a clear association of the composition of the bacterial community with the presence and absence of symptoms in conjunction with the patients' age.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial InfectionsPulpitisAdultDNA, BacterialFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24386438
PMCPMC3875544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.