Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24386435›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Adaptation of an L-proline adenylation domain to use 4-propyl-L-proline in the evolution of lincosamide biosynthesis.

Stanislav Kadlčík, Tomáš Kučera, Dominika Chalupská, Radek Gažák, Markéta Koběrská, Dana Ulanová, Jan Kopecký, Eva Kutejová, Lucie Najmanová, Jiří Janata

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stanislav KadlčíkInstitute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš KučeraInstitute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dominika ChalupskáInstitute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Radek GažákInstitute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Markéta KoběrskáInstitute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dana UlanováInstitute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan KopeckýInstitute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eva KutejováInstitute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic ; Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovac Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Lucie NajmanováInstitute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiří JanataInstitute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZInstitute of Molecular Biology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinically used lincosamide antibiotic lincomycin incorporates in its structure 4-propyl-L-proline (PPL), an unusual amino acid, while celesticetin, a less efficient related compound, makes use of proteinogenic L-proline. Biochemical characterization, as well as phylogenetic analysis and homology modelling combined with the molecular dynamics simulation were employed for complex comparative analysis of the orthologous protein pair LmbC and CcbC from the biosynthesis of lincomycin and celesticetin, respectively. The analysis proved the compared proteins to be the stand-alone adenylation domains strictly preferring their own natural substrate, PPL or L-proline. The LmbC substrate binding pocket is adapted to accommodate a rare PPL precursor. When compared with L-proline specific ones, several large amino acid residues were replaced by smaller ones opening a channel which allowed the alkyl side chain of PPL to be accommodated. One of the most important differences, that of the residue corresponding to V306 in CcbC changing to G308 in LmbC, was investigated in vitro and in silico. Moreover, the substrate binding pocket rearrangement also allowed LmbC to effectively adenylate 4-butyl-L-proline and 4-pentyl-L-proline, substrates with even longer alkyl side chains, producing more potent lincosamides. A shift of LmbC substrate specificity appears to be an integral part of biosynthetic pathway adaptation to the PPL acquisition. A set of genes presumably coding for the PPL biosynthesis is present in the lincomycin--but not in the celesticetin cluster; their homologs are found in biosynthetic clusters of some pyrrolobenzodiazepines (PBD) and hormaomycin. Whereas in the PBD and hormaomycin pathways the arising precursors are condensed to another amino acid moiety, the LmbC protein is the first functionally proved part of a unique condensation enzyme connecting PPL to the specialized amino sugar building unit.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationBacterial ProteinsDipeptidesLincomycinLincosamidesProtein Structure, TertiaryStreptomycesBacterial Proteinscelesticetin ADipeptidesLincomycinLincosamidesprolyl-proline

Identifiers

PMID24386435
PMCPMC3874040
OpenAlexW2038282749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.