Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24386403›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Neural adaptation and behavioral measures of temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant recipients.

Fawen Zhang, Chelsea Benson, Dora Murphy, Melissa Boian, Michael Scott, Robert Keith, Jing Xiang, Paul Abbas

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Coding of consonant-vowel transition in children with central auditory processing disorder: an electrophysiological study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fawen ZhangDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Chelsea BensonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Dora MurphyDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Melissa BoianDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Michael ScottDepartment of Audiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Robert KeithDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Jing XiangNeurology Division, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Paul AbbasDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.

Funding

Cincinnati Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences and TrainingUL1TR000077 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., TSEVAT, JOEL · 2012 to 2014
$9.9M
Temporal Processing Properties of the Auditory System in Cochlear Implant SystemsR15DC011004 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI ZHANG, FAWEN · 2010 to 2010
$487k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000077NIDCD NIH HHS 1R15DC011004-01NIDCD NIH HHS R15 DC011004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to determine if one of the neural temporal features, neural adaptation, can account for the across-subject variability in behavioral measures of temporal processing and speech perception performance in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Neural adaptation is the phenomenon in which neural responses are the strongest at the beginning of the stimulus and decline following stimulus repetition (e.g., stimulus trains). It is unclear how this temporal property of neural responses relates to psychophysical measures of temporal processing (e.g., gap detection) or speech perception. The adaptation of the electrical compound action potential (ECAP) was obtained using 1000 pulses per second (pps) biphasic pulse trains presented directly to the electrode. The adaptation of the late auditory evoked potential (LAEP) was obtained using a sequence of 1-kHz tone bursts presented acoustically, through the cochlear implant. Behavioral temporal processing was measured using the Random Gap Detection Test at the most comfortable listening level. Consonant nucleus consonant (CNC) word and AzBio sentences were also tested. The results showed that both ECAP and LAEP display adaptive patterns, with a substantial across-subject variability in the amount of adaptation. No correlations between the amount of neural adaptation and gap detection thresholds (GDTs) or speech perception scores were found. The correlations between the degree of neural adaptation and demographic factors showed that CI users having more LAEP adaptation were likely to be those implanted at a younger age than CI users with less LAEP adaptation. The results suggested that neural adaptation, at least this feature alone, cannot account for the across-subject variability in temporal processing ability in the CI users. However, the finding that the LAEP adaptive pattern was less prominent in the CI group compared to the normal hearing group may suggest the important role of normal adaptation pattern at the cortical level in speech perception.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalCochlear ImplantsEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHearing LossSpatial ProcessingSpeech PerceptionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24386403
PMCPMC3873438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.