Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24386239›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Cell cycle-dependent Rho GTPase activity dynamically regulates cancer cell motility and invasion in vivo.

Yoshinori Kagawa, Shinji Matsumoto, Yuji Kamioka, Koshi Mimori, Yoko Naito, Taeko Ishii, Daisuke Okuzaki, Naohiro Nishida, Sakae Maeda, Atsushi Naito and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Specific effects of hypoxia-immune core geneTranslational cancer research · 2025
    Article
  9. The hGIDLife science alliance · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshinori KagawaDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics, WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; JST, CREST, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan ; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Shinji MatsumotoDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yuji KamiokaDepartment of Pathology and Biology of Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Koshi MimoriDepartment of Surgery, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Beppu, Oita, Japan.
Yoko NaitoDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics, WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Taeko IshiiDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics, WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Daisuke OkuzakiDNA-chip Developmental Center for Infectious Diseases, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Naohiro NishidaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Department of Surgery, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Beppu, Oita, Japan.
Sakae MaedaDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics, WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Atsushi NaitoDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics, WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Junichi KikutaDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics, WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; JST, CREST, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Keizo NishikawaLaboratory of Cellular Dynamics, WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; JST, CREST, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Junichi NishimuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Naotsugu HaraguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Ichiro TakemasaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Tsunekazu MizushimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Masataka IkedaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hirofumi YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Mitsugu SekimotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hideshi IshiiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Michiyuki MatsudaDepartment of Pathology and Biology of Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Akira KikuchiDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Masaki MoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Masaru IshiiDepartment of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics, WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; JST, CREST, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Osaka University · JPKyoto University · JPKyushu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanism behind the spatiotemporal control of cancer cell dynamics and its possible association with cell proliferation has not been well established. By exploiting the intravital imaging technique, we found that cancer cell motility and invasive properties were closely associated with the cell cycle. In vivo inoculation of human colon cancer cells bearing fluorescence ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (Fucci) demonstrated an unexpected phenomenon: S/G2/M cells were more motile and invasive than G1 cells. Microarray analyses showed that Arhgap11a, an uncharacterized Rho GTPase-activating protein (RhoGAP), was expressed in a cell-cycle-dependent fashion. Expression of ARHGAP11A in cancer cells suppressed RhoA-dependent mechanisms, such as stress fiber formation and focal adhesion, which made the cells more prone to migrate. We also demonstrated that RhoA suppression by ARHGAP11A induced augmentation of relative Rac1 activity, leading to an increase in the invasive properties. RNAi-based inhibition of Arhgap11a reduced the invasion and in vivo expansion of cancers. Additionally, analysis of human specimens showed the significant up-regulation of Arhgap11a in colon cancers, which was correlated with clinical invasion status. The present study suggests that ARHGAP11A, a cell cycle-dependent RhoGAP, is a critical regulator of cancer cell mobility and is thus a promising therapeutic target in invasive cancers.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell MovementCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsEnzyme ActivationGene ExpressionGene Knockdown TechniquesGTPase-Activating ProteinsHCT116 CellsHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasmsGTPase-Activating Proteinsrho GTPase-activating protein

Identifiers

PMID24386239
PMCPMC3875446
OpenAlexW1990905635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.