Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24386193›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Determination of HER2 amplification status on tumour DNA by digital PCR.

Isaac Garcia-Murillas, Maryou Lambros, Nicholas C Turner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of Antigen Retrieval on Genomic DNA From Immunodissected Samples.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. HER2 mRNA transcript quantitation in breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isaac Garcia-MurillasThe Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Maryou LambrosThe Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas C TurnerThe Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom ; Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Breast Cancer Now · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determination of the presence of HER2 amplification by quantitative PCR has been challenging, in part due to chromosomal instability and identification of a robust a reference region. We assessed the potential of digital PCR for highly accurate assessment of DNA concentration with EFTUD2 as chromosome 17 reference probe. We assessed a HER2:EFTDU2 ratio by digital PCR assay in the microdissected DNA from 18 HER2 amplified and 58 HER2 non-amplified cancers. The HER2:EFTUD2 ratio had high concordance with conventionally defined HER2 status with a sensitivity of 100% (18/18) and a specificity of 98% (57/58). The HER2:EFTUD2 digital PCR assay has potential to accurately assess HER2 amplification status.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChromosomes, Human, Pair 17Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPeptide Elongation FactorsPolymerase Chain ReactionRibonucleoprotein, U5 Small NuclearSensitivity and SpecificityEFTUD2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPeptide Elongation FactorsRibonucleoprotein, U5 Small Nuclear

Identifiers

PMID24386193
PMCPMC3873285
OpenAlexW1970558122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.