Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24386079›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Fine-scale genetic response to landscape change in a gliding mammal.

Ross L Goldingay, Katherine A Harrisson, Andrea C Taylor, Tina M Ball, David J Sharpe, Brendan D Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Are Urban Populations of a Gliding Mammal Vulnerable to Decline?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Urban rat races: spatial population genomics of brown rats (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ross L GoldingaySchool of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
Katherine A HarrissonAustralian Centre for Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Andrea C TaylorAustralian Centre for Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Tina M BallCentral Queensland University and Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Mackay, Queensland, Australia.
David J SharpeSchool of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
Brendan D TaylorSchool of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
Southern Cross University · AUMonash University · AUCentral Queensland University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how populations respond to habitat loss is central to conserving biodiversity. Population genetic approaches enable the identification of the symptoms of population disruption in advance of population collapse. However, the spatio-temporal scales at which population disruption occurs are still too poorly known to effectively conserve biodiversity in the face of human-induced landscape change. We employed microsatellite analysis to examine genetic structure and diversity over small spatial (mostly 1-50 km) and temporal scales (20-50 years) in the squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis), a gliding mammal that is commonly subjected to a loss of habitat connectivity. We identified genetically differentiated local populations over distances as little as 3 km and within 30 years of landscape change. Genetically isolated local populations experienced the loss of genetic diversity, and significantly increased mean relatedness, which suggests increased inbreeding. Where tree cover remained, genetic differentiation was less evident. This pattern was repeated in two landscapes located 750 km apart. These results lend support to other recent studies that suggest the loss of habitat connectivity can produce fine-scale population genetic change in a range of taxa. This gives rise to the prediction that many other vertebrates will experience similar genetic changes. Our results suggest the future collapse of local populations of this gliding mammal is likely unless habitat connectivity is maintained or restored. Landscape management must occur on a fine-scale to avert the erosion of biodiversity.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesReproductive IsolationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiodiversityEcosystemGene FlowGenetic VariationGenotypeMicrosatellite RepeatsPopulation DynamicsSciuridaeTrees

Identifiers

PMID24386079
PMCPMC3873248
OpenAlexW2077608395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.