Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24385860›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2013

Introduction of the rd29A:AtDREB2A CA gene into soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) and its molecular characterization in leaves and roots during dehydration.

Cibelle Engels, Renata Fuganti-Pagliarini, Silvana Regina Rockenbach Marin, Francismar Corrêa Marcelino-Guimarães, Maria Cristina Neves Oliveira, Norihito Kanamori, Junya Mizoi, Kazuo Nakashima, Kazuko Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, Alexandre Lima Nepomuceno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Isolation and characterization of drought and ABA responsive promoter of a transcription factor encoding gene from rice.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cibelle EngelsDepartamento de Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, PR, Brazil .
Renata Fuganti-PagliariniLaboratório de Biotecnologia Vegetal, Embrapa Soja, Londrina, PR, Brazil .
Silvana Regina Rockenbach MarinLaboratório de Biotecnologia Vegetal, Embrapa Soja, Londrina, PR, Brazil .
Francismar Corrêa Marcelino-GuimarãesLaboratório de Biotecnologia Vegetal, Embrapa Soja, Londrina, PR, Brazil .
Maria Cristina Neves OliveiraLaboratório de Biotecnologia Vegetal, Embrapa Soja, Londrina, PR, Brazil .
Norihito KanamoriBiological Resources and Post-Harvest Division, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan .
Junya MizoiLaboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan .
Kazuo NakashimaBiological Resources and Post-Harvest Division, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan .
Kazuko Yamaguchi-ShinozakiBiological Resources and Post-Harvest Division, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan . ; Laboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan .
Alexandre Lima NepomucenoLaboratório de Biotecnologia Vegetal, Embrapa Soja, Londrina, PR, Brazil .
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRJapan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The loss of soybean yield to Brazilian producers because of a water deficit in the 2011-2012 season was 12.9%. To reduce such losses, molecular biology techniques, including plant transformation, can be used to insert genes of interest into conventional soybean cultivars to produce lines that are more tolerant to drought. The abscisic acid (ABA)-independent Dehydration Responsive Element Binding (DREB) gene family has been used to obtain plants with increased tolerance to abiotic stresses. In the present study, the rd29A:AtDREB2A CA gene from Arabidopsis thaliana was inserted into soybean using biolistics. Seventy-eight genetically modified (GM) soybean lines containing 2-17 copies of the AtDREB2A CA gene were produced. Two GM soybean lines (P1397 and P2193) were analyzed to assess the differential expression of the AtDREB2A CA transgene in leaves and roots submitted to various dehydration treatments. Both GM lines exhibited high expression of the transgene, with the roots of P2193 showing the highest expression levels during water deficit. Physiological parameters examined during water deficit confirmed the induction of stress. This analysis of AtDREB2A CA expression in GM soybean indicated that line P2193 had the greatest stability and highest expression in roots during water deficit-induced stress.

Indexed as

Arabidopsisdifferential expressiongenetically modified organismwater deficit

Identifiers

PMID24385860
PMCPMC3873188
OpenAlexW2026605914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.