Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24385505›Full record

ReviewCirculation research2014

Cardiac stem cell biology: glimpse of the past, present, and future.

Elena Matsa, Karim Sallam, Joseph C Wu

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena MatsaFrom the Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Departments of Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Karim Sallam
Joseph C Wu

Funding

Induced pluripotent stem cells in the understanding and treatment of heart diseaseU01HL099776 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2009 to 2015
$8.2M
Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Cardiovascular Disease ModelingR01HL113006 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WU, JOSEPH C. · 2012 to 2025
$6.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113006NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac regeneration strategies and de novo generation of cardiomyocytes have long been significant areas of research interest in cardiovascular medicine. In this review, we outline a variety of common cell sources and methods used to regenerate cardiomyocytes and highlight the important role that key Circulation Research articles have played in this flourishing field.

Indexed as

RegenerationStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCell DifferentiationHeartHeart DiseasesHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMyocytes, CardiacStem Cell ResearchStem Cellsadult stem cellsembryonic stem cellsinduced pluripotent stem cells

Identifiers

PMID24385505
PMCPMC6430634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.