Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24384902›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2014

Safety and availability of clofazimine in the treatment of multidrug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: analysis of published guidance and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Thomas J Hwang, Svetlana Dotsenko, Azizkhon Jafarov, Karin Weyer, Dennis Falzon, Kaspars Lunte, Paul Nunn, Ernesto Jaramillo, Salmaan Keshavjee, Douglas F Wares

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. An Official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Guideline
  3. Macrolide-resistantJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. New and Repurposed Drugs for the Treatment of Active Tuberculosis: An Update for Clinicians.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. MDR Tuberculosis Treatment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Drug susceptibility patterns of rapidly growing mycobacteria isolated from skin and soft tissue infections in Venezuela.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas J HwangFaculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Svetlana Dotsenko
Azizkhon Jafarov
Karin Weyer
Dennis Falzon
Kaspars Lunte
Paul Nunn
Ernesto Jaramillo
Salmaan Keshavjee
Douglas F Wares
World Health Organization · CHHarvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGiven the spread of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), new therapies are urgently needed, including the repurposing of existing drugs. We aimed to assess key considerations for the clinical and programmatic use of clofazimine (Cfz), a riminophenazine with antimycobacterial activity currently used to treat leprosy.

designFixed and random effects meta-analysis of cohort studies and systematic review.

settingElectronic and manual searches were combined. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Observational studies on treatment of multidrug-resistant and extremely drug-resistant tuberculosis with Cfz or a Cfz-containing regimen, and published guidance and documents relating to cost and availability were eligible.

results5 observational studies enrolled 861 patients, of which 602 received Cfz. The pooled proportion of adverse drug reactions requiring discontinuation of Cfz treatment was 0.1% (95% CI (0.0 to 0.6%)), and the median frequency of all adverse events was 5.1%. Cfz showed in vitro efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Cfz-containing regimens may have had a useful role in the treatment of patients with drug-resistant strains and who had limited alternative treatment options. However, Cfz uptake remains insufficient to meet global needs; there is only one internationally quality-assured manufacturer, which produces a limited quantity of the drug prioritised for treatment of leprosy, the only indication for which the drug is registered.

conclusionsWhile the data were limited, Cfz was associated with a risk for adverse drug reactions comparable to that of first-line TB treatment, which could be reasonably managed under programmatic conditions. However, low market availability and high cost are important barriers to access to Cfz for patients with MDR-TB.

Indexed as

ClofazimineCohort StudiesExtensively Drug-Resistant TuberculosisHumansLeprostatic AgentsPractice Guidelines as TopicTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantClofazimineLeprostatic AgentsInfectious Diseases

Identifiers

PMID24384902
PMCPMC3902362
OpenAlexW2120635139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.