Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24384835›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2014

Concomitant gemcitabine therapy negatively affects DC vaccine-induced CD8(+) T-cell and B-cell responses but improves clinical efficacy in a murine pancreatic carcinoma model.

Christian Bauer, Alexander Sterzik, Franz Bauernfeind, Peter Duewell, Claudius Conrad, Rosemarie Kiefl, Stefan Endres, Andreas Eigler, Max Schnurr, Marc Dauer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dendritic cells based immunotherapy.American journal of cancer research · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Chronic Myelocytic Leukemia (CML) Patient-Derived Dendritic Cells Transfected with Autologous Total RNA Induces CML-Specific Cytotoxicity.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. New targeted therapies in pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian BauerSection of Gastroenterology, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander Sterzik
Franz Bauernfeind
Peter Duewell
Claudius Conrad
Rosemarie Kiefl
Stefan Endres
Andreas Eigler
Max Schnurr
Marc Dauer
LMU Klinikum · DEHarvard University · USMünchen Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple studies have shown that dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccines can induce antitumor immunity. Previously, we reported that gemcitabine enhances the efficacy of DC vaccination in a mouse model of pancreatic carcinoma. The present study aimed at investigating the influence of gemcitabine on vaccine-induced anti-tumoral immune responses in a syngeneic pancreatic cancer model. MATERIALS AND

methodsSubcutaneous or orthotopic pancreatic tumors were induced in C57BL/6 mice using Panc02 cells expressing the model antigen OVA. Bone marrow-derived DC were loaded with soluble OVA protein (OVA-DC). Animals received gemcitabine twice weekly. OVA-specific CD8(+) T-cells and antibody titers were monitored by FACS analysis and ELISA, respectively.

resultsGemcitabine enhanced clinical efficacy of the OVA-DC vaccine. Interestingly, gemcitabine significantly suppressed the vaccine-induced frequency of antigen-specific CD8(+) T-cells and antibody titers. DC migration to draining lymph nodes and antigen cross-presentation were unaffected. Despite reduced numbers of tumor-reactive T-cells in peripheral blood, in vivo cytotoxicity assays revealed that cytotoxic T-cell (CTL)-mediated killing was preserved. In vitro assays revealed sensitization of tumor cells to CTL-mediated lysis by gemcitabine. In addition, gemcitabine facilitated recruitment of CD8(+) T-cells into tumors in DC-vaccinated mice. T- and B-cell suppression by gemcitabine could be avoided by starting chemotherapy after two cycles of DC vaccination.

conclusionsGemcitabine enhances therapeutic efficacy of DC vaccination despite its negative influence on vaccine-induced T-cell proliferation. Quantitative analysis of tumor-reactive T-cells in peripheral blood may thus not predict vaccination success in the setting of concomitant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Immunosuppression TherapyAdenocarcinomaAnimalsAntibody SpecificityAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticB-LymphocytesCancer VaccinesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyDendritic CellsDeoxycytidineDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGemcitabineAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCancer VaccinesDeoxycytidineGemcitabineOVA-8OvalbuminPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID24384835
PMCPMC11029406
OpenAlexW2047877663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.