ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2014
Relevance of current guidelines in the management of VUR.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of various treatment modalities in children with vesicoureteral reflux grades II-IV: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ paediatrics open · 2023Pooled it
- Primary vesicoureteral reflux.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
- When there is Confusion and Conflicts - Ask Delphi!Journal of neonatal surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledIn recent years, there have been fundamental changes in the understanding of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This is reflected by current international guidelines that cover diagnosis, screening, and treatment of VUR. However, literature is still lacking and many questions are unsolved. In this article, we shortly review the important aspects of the current guidelines. Due to the lack of high-powered randomized controlled trials, guidelines often are based on an expert's opinion rather than evidence. In this review article, we address the controversies in the management of VUR; siblings and children with antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis and the management of a patient with VUR.
conclusionWith an individualized approach and patient risk stratification, the goal today must be to address the clinical problem, avoid unnecessary tests, and provide good quality of life for the patient and parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.