Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24384689›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2015

Participant and site characteristics related to participant retention in a diabetes prevention translational project.

Luohua Jiang, Spero M Manson, Edward J Dill, Janette Beals, Ann Johnson, Haixiao Huang, Kelly J Acton, Yvette Roubideaux, Special Diabetes Program for Indians Diabetes Prevention Demonstration Project

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Physical Activity Intervention Adaptation: Recommendations from Rural American Indian Older Adults.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luohua JiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Rural Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 219 SRPH Administration Building, TAMU 1266, College Station, TX, 77843-1266, USA, ljiang@srph.tamhsc.edu.
Spero M Manson
Edward J Dill
Janette Beals
Ann Johnson
Haixiao Huang
Kelly J Acton
Yvette Roubideaux
Special Diabetes Program for Indians Diabetes Prevention Demonstration Project

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH COREP30DK092923 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Angela Gwen Brega · 2011 to 2026
$10.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NIDDK NIH HHS 1P30DK092923NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using multilevel analysis, this study investigated participant and site characteristics associated with participant retention in a multisite diabetes prevention translational project among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people. We analyzed data from the Special Diabetes Program for Indians Diabetes Prevention Program (SDPI-DP), a lifestyle intervention to prevent diabetes implemented in 36 AI/AN grantee sites. A total of 2,553 participants were recruited and started the intervention between January 1, 2006 and July 31, 2008. They were offered the 16-session Lifestyle Balance Curriculum from the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in the first 16-24 weeks of intervention. Generalized estimating equation models and proportional hazards models with robust standard error estimates were used to evaluate the relationships of participant and site characteristics with retention. As of July 31, 2009, about 50 % of SDPI-DP participants were lost to follow-up. Those who were younger, male, with lower household income, no family support person, and more baseline chronic pain were at higher risk for both short-term and long-term retention failure (i.e., not completing all 16 DPP sessions and loss to follow-up, respectively). Sites with large user populations and younger staff had lower likelihood of retaining participants successfully. Other site characteristics related to higher risk for retention failure included staff rating of participant disinterest in SDPI-DP and barriers to participant transportation and child/elder care. Future translational initiatives need to pay attention to both participant- and site-level factors in order to maximize participant retention.

Indexed as

Indians, North AmericanInuitPatient ParticipationAdolescentAdultAlaskaColoradoDemographyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID24384689
PMCPMC4081526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.