Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24383482›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2014

Clinical, sociodemographic, and service provider determinants of guideline concordant colorectal cancer care for Appalachian residents.

Steven T Fleming, Heath B Mackley, Fabian Camacho, Eric E Seiber, Niraj J Gusani, Stephen A Matthews, Jason Liao, Tse-Chuan Yang, Wenke Hwang, Nengliang Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Steven T FlemingDepartments of Epidemiology & Health Services Management, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky.
Heath B Mackley
Fabian Camacho
Eric E Seiber
Niraj J Gusani
Stephen A Matthews
Jason Liao
Tse-Chuan Yang
Wenke Hwang
Nengliang Yao
Pennsylvania State University · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Jennifer F Rogers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Population Research InstituteR24HD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI JOHNSON, DAVID R · 2001 to 2016
$9.7M
Patterns of Patient Care in AppalachiaR01CA140335 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI ANDERSON, ROGER T. · 2010 to 2012
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA140335NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140335NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041025NICHD NIH HHS R24-HD41025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer represents a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in Appalachia where high mortality from colorectal cancer is more prevalent. Adherence to treatment guidelines leads to improved survival. This paper examines determinants of guideline concordance for colorectal cancer.

methodsColorectal cancer patients diagnosed in 2006-2008 from 4 cancer registries (Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina) were linked to Medicare claims (2005-2009). Final sample size after exclusions was 2,932 stage I-III colon, and 184 stage III rectal cancer patients. The 3 measures of guideline concordance include adjuvant chemotherapy (stage III colon cancer, <80 years), ≥12 lymph nodes assessed (resected stage I-III colon cancer), and radiation therapy (stage III rectal cancer, <80 years). Bivariate and multivariate analyses with clinical, sociodemographic, and service provider covariates were estimated for each of the measures.

resultsRates of chemotherapy, lymph node assessment, and radiation were 62.9%, 66.3%, and 56.0%, respectively. Older patients had lower rates of chemotherapy and radiation. Five comorbidities were significantly associated with lower concordance in the bivariate analyses: myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, respiratory diseases, dementia with chemotherapy, and diabetes with adequate lymph node assessment. Patients treated by hospitals with no Commission on Cancer (COC) designation or lower surgical volumes had lower odds of adequate lymph node assessment.

conclusionsClinical, sociodemographic, and service provider characteristics are significant determinants of the variation in guideline concordance rates of 3 colorectal cancer measures.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceAgedAged, 80 and overAppalachian RegionColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKentuckyMaleMedicareNorth CarolinaOhioPennsylvaniaSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Statescancerdemographyepidemiologyhealth disparitiesMedicare

Identifiers

PMID24383482
PMCPMC3882337
OpenAlexW1949223619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.