ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2014
High-throughput flow cytometry data normalization for clinical trials.
Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- CytoBatchFlagR: A Comprehensive Framework to Objectively Assess High-Parameter Cytometry Data for Batch Effects.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2026Article
- Comparison of three machine learning algorithms for classification of B-cell neoplasms using clinical flow cytometry data.Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry · 2024Article
- A flow-cytometry-based pipeline for the rapid quantification of C2C12 cell differentiation.STAR protocols · 2023Article
- Flow Cytometry: The Next Revolution.Cells · 2023Review
- Multiparameter flow cytometry in the evaluation of myelodysplasia: Analytical issues: Recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet/International Myelodysplastic Syndrome Flow Cytometry Working Group.Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry · 2023Review
- Article
- cyCombine allows for robust integration of single-cell cytometry datasets within and across technologies.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Analyzing high-dimensional cytometry data using FlowSOM.Nature protocols · 2021Review
- CytoPy: An autonomous cytometry analysis framework.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Alterations in B cell subsets correlate with body composition parameters in female adolescents with anorexia nervosa.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- High Throughput Multi-Omics Approaches for Clinical Trial Evaluation and Drug Discovery.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- A review on methods for diagnosis of breast cancer cells and tissues.Cell proliferation · 2020Review
- CytoNorm: A Normalization Algorithm for Cytometry Data.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2020Article
- Key steps and methods in the experimental design and data analysis of highly multi-parametric flow and mass cytometry.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition).European journal of immunology · 2019Article
- Supervised Machine Learning with CITRUS for Single Cell Biomarker Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Data-Driven Flow Cytometry Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Review
- Immune Cell Profiling During Switching from Natalizumab to Fingolimod Reveals Differential Effects on Systemic Immune-Regulatory Networks and on Trafficking of Non-T Cell Populations into the Cerebrospinal Fluid-Results from the ToFingo Successor Study.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies.European journal of immunology · 2017Article
- flowVS: channel-specific variance stabilization in flow cytometry.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Flow cytometry datasets from clinical trials generate very large datasets and are usually highly standardized, focusing on endpoints that are well defined apriori. Staining variability of individual makers is not uncommon and complicates manual gating, requiring the analyst to adapt gates for each sample, which is unwieldy for large datasets. It can lead to unreliable measurements, especially if a template-gating approach is used without further correction to the gates. In this article, a computational framework is presented for normalizing the fluorescence intensity of multiple markers in specific cell populations across samples that is suitable for high-throughput processing of large clinical trial datasets. Previous approaches to normalization have been global and applied to all cells or data with debris removed. They provided no mechanism to handle specific cell subsets. This approach integrates tightly with the gating process so that normalization is performed during gating and is local to the specific cell subsets exhibiting variability. This improves peak alignment and the performance of the algorithm. The performance of this algorithm is demonstrated on two clinical trial datasets from the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) and the Immune Tolerance Network (ITN). In the ITN data set we show that local normalization combined with template gating can account for sample-to-sample variability as effectively as manual gating. In the HVTN dataset, it is shown that local normalization mitigates false-positive vaccine response calls in an intracellular cytokine staining assay. In both datasets, local normalization performs better than global normalization. The normalization framework allows the use of template gates even in the presence of sample-to-sample staining variability, mitigates the subjectivity and bias of manual gating, and decreases the time necessary to analyze large datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.