Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24381934›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2013

Laboratory diagnosis of persistent human chlamydial infection.

Mirja Puolakkainen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Biomedicines · 2025
    Article
  4. Current Evidence of Maternal Infection With Chlamydia trachomatis and Preeclampsia Risk.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Atypical pneumonia (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. The serodiagnositic value ofFrontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The role of viable but non-infectious developmental forms in chlamydial biology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mirja PuolakkainenDepartment of Virology, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland ; HUSLAB, Department of Virology and Immunology, Helsinki University Central Hospital Helsinki, Finland.
Helsinki University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic assays for persistent chlamydial infection are much needed to conduct high-quality, large-scale studies investigating the persistent state in vivo, its disease associations and the response to therapy. Yet in most studies the distinction between acute and persistent infection is based on the interpretation of the data obtained by the assays developed to diagnose acute infections or on complex assays available for research only and/or difficult to establish for clinical use. Novel biomarkers for detection of persistent chlamydial infection are urgently needed. Chlamydial whole genome proteome arrays are now available and they can identify chlamydial antigens that are differentially expressed between acute infection and persistent infection. Utilizing these data will lead to the development of novel diagnostic assays. Carefully selected specimens from well-studied patient populations are clearly needed in the process of translating the proteomic data into assays useful for clinical practice. Before such antigens are identified and validated assays become available, we face a challenge of deciding whether the persistent infection truly induced appearance of the proposed marker or do we just base our diagnosis of persistent infection on the presence of the suggested markers. Consequently, we must bear this in mind when interpreting the available data.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBiomedical ResearchChlamydia InfectionsChronic DiseaseClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansBiomarkersChlamydia pneumoniaeChlamydia trachomatisdiagnosispersistent infectionproteomics

Identifiers

PMID24381934
PMCPMC3865385
OpenAlexW2014527630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.