ArticleThe Neurohospitalist2014
Computerized physician order entry: promise, perils, and experience.
Article in The Neurohospitalist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Language Processing for Enhanced Clinical Decision Support in Allergy Verification for Medication Prescriptions.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Implementation and Adoption of an Order-Based Surgical Case Request Tool across Subspecialty Clinics.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Red blood cell transfusion clinical decision support: A scoping review of guideline adherence and clinical impact.Transfusion · 2025Article
- Implementation of Computerized Prescriber Order Entry Systems: A Review of Impacts, Barriers, and Facilitators.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in the pre-analytical phase: State-of-the art and future perspectives.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2024Article
- Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2022Review
- High alert drugs screening using gradient boosting classifier.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A Methodological Assessment of Pharmacist Therapeutic Intervention Documentation (TID) in a Single Tertiary Care Hospital in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Real-time display of laboratory testing status improves satisfaction levels in an emergency department: A pilot study.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
- Medication prescribing errors: a pre- and post-computerized physician order entry retrospective study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019Article
- Physicians' and Nurses' Opinions about the Impact of a Computerized Provider Order Entry System on Their Workflow.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) has been promoted as an important component of patient safety, quality improvement, and modernization of medical practice. In practice, however, CPOE affects health care delivery in complex ways, with benefits as well as risks. Every implementation of CPOE is associated with both generally recognized and unique local factors that can facilitate or confound its rollout, and neurohospitalists will often be at the forefront of such rollouts. In this article, we review the literature on CPOE, beginning with definitions and proceeding to comparisons to the standard of care. We then proceed to discuss clinical decision support systems, negative aspects of CPOE, and cultural context of CPOE implementation. Before concluding, we follow the experiences of a Chief Medical Information Officer and neurohospitalist who rolled out a CPOE system at his own health care organization and managed the resulting workflow changes and setbacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.