ReviewFrontiers in genetics2013
Genetic interaction networks: better understand to better predict.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- GiGCN: a network-based framework for uncovering synthetic lethal and viable genetic interactions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- An Introduction to Network Analysis in Plant Biology.Plant direct · 2025Article
- A mathematical framework for the quantitative analysis of genetic buffering.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Cas13d as a tool for genetic interaction mapping.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Contact lenses as novel tear fluid sampling vehicles for total RNA isolation, precipitation, and amplification.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The genetics of gaits in Icelandic horses goes beyond DMRT3, with RELN and STAU2 identified as two new candidate genes.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Whole Exome Sequencing of a Patient with a Milder Phenotype of Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group C.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Genetic interactions of schizophrenia using gene-based statistical epistasis exclusively identify nervous system-related pathways and key hub genes.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Calcineurin Inhibitors Synergize with Manogepix to Kill Diverse Human Fungal Pathogens.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Selecting Genetic Variants and Interactions Associated with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Group LASSO Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- An orthologous gene coevolution network provides insight into eukaryotic cellular and genomic structure and function.Science advances · 2022Article
- Genetic Interaction betweenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- ESRRG, ATP4A, and ATP4B as Diagnostic Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer: A Bioinformatic Analysis Based on Machine Learning.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Combinatorial CRISPR/Cas9 Screening Reveals Epistatic Networks of Interacting Tumor Suppressor Genes and Therapeutic Targets in Human Breast Cancer.Cancer research · 2021Article
- Identifying Disease Related Genes by Network Representation and Convolutional Neural Network.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Exploring Candidate Human Synthetic Lethal Interactions Through siRNA and Quantitative Imaging-Based Approaches.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Employing Cross-Species Approaches to Construct Humanized Genetic Interaction Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Inference of mutability landscapes of tumors from single cell sequencing data.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- The CINs of Polo-Like Kinase 1 in Cancer.Cancers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A genetic interaction (GI) between two genes generally indicates that the phenotype of a double mutant differs from what is expected from each individual mutant. In the last decade, genome scale studies of quantitative GIs were completed using mainly synthetic genetic array technology and RNA interference in yeast and Caenorhabditis elegans. These studies raised questions regarding the functional interpretation of GIs, the relationship of genetic and molecular interaction networks, the usefulness of GI networks to infer gene function and co-functionality, the evolutionary conservation of GI, etc. While GIs have been used for decades to dissect signaling pathways in genetic models, their functional interpretations are still not trivial. The existence of a GI between two genes does not necessarily imply that these two genes code for interacting proteins or that the two genes are even expressed in the same cell. In fact, a GI only implies that the two genes share a functional relationship. These two genes may be involved in the same biological process or pathway; or they may also be involved in compensatory pathways with unrelated apparent function. Considering the powerful opportunity to better understand gene function, genetic relationship, robustness and evolution, provided by a genome-wide mapping of GIs, several in silico approaches have been employed to predict GIs in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Most of these methods used weighted data integration. In this article, we will review the later knowledge acquired on GI networks in metazoans by looking more closely into their relationship with pathways, biological processes and molecular complexes but also into their modularity and organization. We will also review the different in silico methods developed to predict GIs and will discuss how the knowledge acquired on GI networks can be used to design predictive tools with higher performances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.