Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24381276›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Training-induced changes in inhibitory control network activity.

Elliot T Berkman, Lauren E Kahn, Junaid S Merchant

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02684903 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Coaching Alternative Parenting Strategies (CAPS) Study: Targeting Neurobiological and Behavioral Mechanisms of Self-regulation in High-risk Families

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OregonRan2016 to 2022Enrolled408ConditionsChild Abuse, Self-control, ParentingArmsParent Child Interaction Therapy
NCT03557710 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Devaluing Energy-dense Foods for Cancer-control: Translational Neuroscience

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OregonRan2018 to 2023Enrolled253ConditionsOverweight and Obesity, CancerArmsDevaluing energy-dense foods for cancer-control
NCT04620915 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

High-level Construal as a Novel Pathway for Affect Regulation and Cancer Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OregonRan2021 to 2025Enrolled300ConditionsSmoking Cessation, Smoking Reduction, CancerArmsHigh-level construal, Down-regulation of craving for cigarettes, Up-regulation of goal energization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Associations Between Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Inhibitory Control and Amphetamine Reward Sensitivity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Review
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elliot T BerkmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403.
Lauren E Kahn
Junaid S Merchant
University of Oregon · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive research on inhibitory control (IC) and its neural systems, the questions of whether IC can be improved with training and how the associated neural systems change are understudied. Behavioral evidence suggests that performance on IC tasks improves with training but that these gains do not transfer to other tasks, and almost nothing is known about how activation in IC-related brain regions changes with training. Human participants were randomly assigned to receive IC training (N = 30) on an adaptive version of the stop-signal task (SST) or an active sham-training (N = 30) during 10 sessions across 3 weeks. Neural activation during the SST before and after training was assessed in both groups using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Performance on the SST improved significantly more in the training group than in the control group. The pattern of neuroimaging results was consistent with a proactive control model such that activity in key parts of the IC network shifted earlier in time within the trial, becoming associated with cues that anticipated the upcoming need for IC. Specifically, activity in the inferior frontal gyrus decreased during the implementation of control (i.e., stopping) and increased during cues that preceded the implementation of IC from pretraining to post-training. Also, steeper behavioral improvement in the training group correlated with activation increases during the cue phase and decreases during implementation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These results are the first to uncover the neural pathways for training-related improvements in IC and can explain previous null findings of IC training transfer.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainFemaleHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeural InhibitionPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24381276
PMCPMC3866481
OpenAlexW2016454981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.