Trial reportExperimental brain research2014
Neurophysiological assessment of fatigue in electrical injury patients.
Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wet, volatile, and dry biomarkers of exercise-induced muscle fatigue.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2016Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate for the presence of central and peripheral physiological fatigue in electrical injury (EI) patients with experiential fatigue. Eight EI patients and eight age-matched healthy volunteers were recruited. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and M-waves from ulnar nerve stimulation at the wrist were measured from the right abductor digiti minimi. Fatigue was induced by 2 min of maximal voluntary contraction, and subjects were followed for 15 min of recovery. The experiment was performed twice for each subject. In one of the two sessions (randomly assigned), a blood pressure (BP) cuff was inflated during the first 75 s of recovery period to prolong muscle ischemia. Baseline measures showed no difference in central and peripheral conduction times. Cortical silent period was prolonged in patients compared to controls with no differences in abduction force. Decrement of MEP amplitude with consecutive TMS pulses was observed in the post-recovery period only with EI patients who had prolonged muscle ischemia induced by the BP cuff. The post-exercise M-wave area during contraction was significantly higher for patients. Prolonged cortical silent period in EI patients suggests that they had increased GABAB receptor-mediated cortical inhibition. The ischemia-induced decrement in consecutive MEP amplitudes post-exercise demonstrates greater physiological fatigue in EI patients after exercise. The greater increase in M-wave area of EI patients post-exercise suggests larger decrease in conduction velocity of muscle action potentials with exercise. These findings provide preliminary physiological correlates for increased central and peripheral fatigue in EI patients with experiential fatigue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.