Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24381072›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2014

Pharmacokinetics of a CCR5 inhibitor in rhesus macaques following vaginal, rectal and oral application.

R Karl Malcolm, Deborah Lowry, Peter Boyd, Leslie Geer, Ronald S Veazey, Laurie Goldman, P J Klasse, Robin J Shattock, John P Moore

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. On-demand microbicide products: design matters.Drug delivery and translational research · 2017
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

R Karl MalcolmSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK.
Deborah Lowry
Peter Boyd
Leslie Geer
Ronald S Veazey
Laurie Goldman
P J Klasse
Robin J Shattock
John P Moore
Lubrizol Life Science Health (United States) · USQueen's University Belfast · GBThe London College · GBAston University · GBCornell University · USTulane University · US

Funding

Tulane NPRC SPF Sheltered Outdoor Enclosure ExpansionP51OD011104 · OD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI L Lee HAMM · 2012 to 2026
$142.4M
Testing practical microbicides in macaquesU19AI076982 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI VEAZEY, RONALD S. · 2008 to 2012
$7.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI076982NIH HHS P51 OD011104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study measured and compared the pharmacokinetics of CMPD167, a small molecule antiretroviral CCR5 inhibitor with potential as an HIV microbicide, following vaginal, rectal and oral administration in rhesus macaques.

methodsA vaginal hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) gel, a rectal HEC gel, a silicone elastomer matrix-type vaginal ring and an oral solution, each containing CMPD167, were prepared and administered to rhesus macaques pretreated with Depo-Provera. CMPD167 concentrations in vaginal fluid, vaginal tissue (ring only), rectal fluid and blood plasma were quantified by HPLC-mass spectrometry.

resultsCMPD167 concentrations measured in rectal fluid, vaginal fluid and blood plasma were highly dependent on both the route of administration and the formulation type. Although rectal and vaginal fluid concentrations were highest when CMPD167 was administered locally (via either gel or ring), lower concentrations of the drug were also measured in these compartments following administration at the remote mucosal site or orally. CMPD167 levels in the vaginal and rectal fluid following oral administration were relatively low compared with local administration.

conclusionsThe study provides clear evidence for vaginal-rectal and rectal-vaginal drug transfer pathways and suggests that oral pre-exposure prophylaxis with CMPD167 may be less efficacious at preventing sexual transmission of HIV-1 than topically applied products.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravaginalAdministration, OralAdministration, RectalAnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsBody FluidsCCR5 Receptor AntagonistsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidFemaleMacaca mulattaMaleMass SpectrometryPyrazolesReceptors, HIVValineAnti-HIV AgentsCCR5 Receptor AntagonistsCMPD 167PyrazolesReceptors, HIVValineCMPD167HIV microbicidespre-exposure prophylaxisPrEPrectal gelsvaginal HEC gelsvaginal rings

Identifiers

PMID24381072
PMCPMC3977607
OpenAlexW2117102332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.