Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24381011›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2014

US infant mortality and the President's party.

Javier M Rodriguez, John Bound, Arline T Geronimus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Elections have Consequences: Partisan Politics may be Literally Killing Us.Applied health economics and health policy · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Unequal Associations between Educational Attainment and Occupational Stress across Racial and Ethnic Groups.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Javier M RodriguezPopulation Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, Department of Economics and Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
John BoundPopulation Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, Department of Economics and Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAPopulation Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, Department of Economics and Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Arline T GeronimusPopulation Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, Department of Economics and Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAPopulation Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, Department of Economics and Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA arline@umich.edu.

Funding

TRAINING IN SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEMOGRAPHYT32HD007339 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sarah A. Burgard · 1987 to 2026
$14.9M
Population Studies Center Infrastructure GrantR24HD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SMOCK, PAMELA J. · 2001 to 2016
$13.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041028NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfant mortality rates in the US exceed those in all other developed countries and in many less developed countries, suggesting political factors may contribute.

methodsAnnual time series on overall, White and Black infant mortality rates in the US were analysed over the 1965-2010 time period to ascertain whether infant mortality rates varied across presidential administrations. Data were de-trended using cubic splines and analysed using both graphical and time series regression methods.

resultsAcross all nine presidential administrations, infant mortality rates were below trend when the President was a Democrat and above trend when the President was a Republican. This was true for overall, neonatal and postneonatal mortality. Regression estimates show that, relative to trend, Republican administrations were characterized by infant mortality rates that were, on average, 3% higher than Democratic administrations. In proportional terms, effect size is similar for US Whites and Blacks. US Black rates are more than twice as high as White, implying substantially larger absolute effects for Blacks.

conclusionsWe found a robust, quantitatively important association between net of trend US infant mortality rates and the party affiliation of the president. There may be overlooked ways by which macro-dynamics of policy impact microdynamics of physiology, suggesting the political system is a component of the underlying mechanism generating health inequality in the USA.

Indexed as

PoliticsBlack or African AmericanHealth Status DisparitiesHumansInfantInfant MortalitySmokingSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesWhite Peoplehealth inequalityInfant mortalitypolitical partiesracial disparities

Identifiers

PMID24381011
PMCPMC4052132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.