Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24380996›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014

Surgery for small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors: is there any benefit of the laparoscopic approach?

Marleny N Figueiredo, Léon Maggiori, Sébastien Gaujoux, Anne Couvelard, Nathalie Guedj, Philippe Ruszniewski, Yves Panis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Surgical aspects of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023
    Review
  12. Predictors and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors : Minimally Invasive Surgery for SBNETs.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  13. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Ileal Neuroendocrine Tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Is Laparoscopic CME Right Hemicolectomy an Optimal Indication for NET of the Right Colon and Terminal Ileum?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marleny N FigueiredoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery - Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (PMAD), Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 100, Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France.
Léon Maggiori
Sébastien Gaujoux
Anne Couvelard
Nathalie Guedj
Philippe Ruszniewski
Yves Panis
Université Paris Cité · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Beaujon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgery of small-bowel neuroendocrine (SBNE) tumors is demanding because of the need for associated extensive node dissection and assessment of possible synchronous lesions. For this reason, possible benefit of laparoscopy in SBNE tumors has not been reported to date.

methodsFrom 1996, all patients operated on in Beaujon Hospital for SBNE tumors were retrospectively extracted from a prospectively maintained database of intestinal resections.

resultsOverall, 73 patients [55 % males, median age 55 years (range 27-79)] underwent small bowel resection (n = 38; 54 %), ileocolectomy (n = 25; 36 %), or both (n = 7; 10 %). In 18 patients, resection of synchronous liver metastasis was performed simultaneously. Resection was performed laparoscopically in 12 patients (16 %). Resection was R0 in 40 patients (55 %), R1 in 1 patient (1 %), and R2 in 32 patients (44 %) because of unresectable liver metastases (n = 29), nodal involvement (n = 1), or both (n = 2). Laparoscopy was associated with similar R0 (p = 0.06) and morbidity (p = 0.95) rates, but a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.003) compared with laparotomy. Median follow-up was 39 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 95, 83 and 75 %, respectively, for R0 patients without liver metastasis; 92, 83, and 57 %, respectively, for R0 patients with resected liver metastasis; and 82, 58 and 30 %, respectively, for R2 patients (p = 0.045). Overall survival and PFS did not show any difference when comparing the laparoscopic and open groups.

conclusionComplete resection of primary SBNE tumors with or without liver metastasis is associated with good long-term survival. In selected patients, laparoscopy for SBNE tumors is feasible and associated with a shorter hospital stay than laparotomy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsIntestine, SmallLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID24380996
OpenAlexW1977695258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.