Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24380397›Full record

Trial reportAIDS research and human retroviruses2014

Immunological function restoration with lopinavir/ritonavir versus efavirenz containing regimens in HIV-infected patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Berta Torres, Norma I Rallón, Montserrat Loncá, Alba Díaz, Llucia Alós, Esteban Martínez, Anna Cruceta, Joan Albert Arnaiz, Lorna Leal, Constanza Lucero and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Transcriptome analysis of CD4Virologica Sinica · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Berta Torres1 Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona , Barcelona, Spain .
Norma I Rallón
Montserrat Loncá
Alba Díaz
Llucia Alós
Esteban Martínez
Anna Cruceta
Joan Albert Arnaiz
Lorna Leal
Constanza Lucero
Agathe León
Marcelo Sánchez
Eugenia Negredo
Bonaventura Clotet
José M Gatell
José M Benito
Felipe Garcia
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD4(+) count increase has been reported to be different with lopinavir/r (LPV/r) and efavirenz (EFV)-containing regimens. The different effect of these two regimens on other immune function parameters and the relationship with the gain of CD4(+) count have not been assessed in a randomized clinical trial. Fifty antiretroviral treatment (cART) naïve HIV-infected individuals were randomized to receive LPV/r or EFV both with tenofovir/emtricitabine for 48 weeks. A substudy of immunological function restoration was performed in 22 patients (LPV/r n=10 and EFV n=12). Activation, thymic function, apoptosis, senescence, exhaustion, Treg cells, interleukin (IL)-7-receptor/IL-7 system, thymic volume, and lymphoid tissue fibrosis were evaluated at baseline and at week 48. Both groups experienced a CD4(+) count increase that was higher in the EFV group (ΔCD4(+) 88 vs. 315 cells/μl LPV/r vs. EFV, respectively, p<0.001). Despite this difference in CD4(+) gain, the change in other immune function parameters was similar in both treatment groups. Most of parameters evaluated tended to normalize after 48 weeks of cART. A significant decrease in levels of activation, senescence, exhaustion, and apoptosis on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells (p<0.001 for all) and a significant increase in markers of thymic function, IL-7 receptor, and in the levels of central memory CD4(+) T cells and naive subsets of CD8(+) T cells (p<0.001 for all) with respect to baseline values were observed without any difference between groups. These data indicate that the differences in CD4(+) gain with different cART regimens are not immunologically meaningful and might explain the similar clinical efficacy of these regimens.

Indexed as

AdultAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveBenzoxazinesCD4 Lymphocyte CountCyclopropanesHIV InfectionsHumansImmune SystemLopinavirMaleMiddle AgedRitonavirTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesefavirenzLopinavirRitonavir

Identifiers

PMID24380397
PMCPMC4010173
OpenAlexW2051685129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.