Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24380011›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medical and health sciences research2013

Incidence and distribution of pulp stones found in radiographic dental examination of adult Turkish dental patients.

M Turkal, E Tan, R Uzgur, Mm Hamidi, H Colak, Z Uzgur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medical and health sciences research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish paediatric cohort from the Isparta district: an 8-year retrospective radiographic study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M TurkalDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kιrιkkale University, Kιrιkkale, Turkey.
E TanDepartment of Orthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Kιrιkkale University, Kιrιkkale, Turkey.
R UzgurDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kιrιkkale University, Kιrιkkale, Turkey.
Mm HamidiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kιrιkkale University, Kιrιkkale, Turkey.
H ColakDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ishik University, Arbil, Iraq.
Z UzgurDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kιrιkkale University, Kιrιkkale, Turkey.
Kırıkkale University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulp stones (PS) are discrete calcified masses found in the dental pulp, in the pulp tissue or become attached to or embedded into the dentine. The formation of pulp stones is still something of an enigma, leading to existence of some epidemiological gaps.

aimTo determine the prevalence and distribution of pulp stones in posterior tooth group by using panoramic radiograph. MATERIALS AND

methodsPanoramic radiographs from 6912 patients attending Kirikkale University Dental Faculty Hospital, Kirikkale, Turkey during the period from July 2009 to August 2011 were reviewed for the presence of pulp stones. The overall incidence of pulp stones in the patients and their correlations between female and male patients and between the right-side and left-side occurrences were analyzed by computer program, SPSS 15. (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA) with using the χ(2) test. Differences were considered as significant when P < 0.05.

resultsPulp stones were detected in 879 out of 6912 patients (person prevalence 12.7%). Pulp stones were detected in 2009 teeth out of a total of 96240 teeth to give a tooth prevalence of 2.1%. Their occurrence was higher in the maxilla than in the mandible for each tooth type. Pulp stones were found to involve the right side more (1224/2009) (61%) than the left side (785/2009)(39%) and they were significantly more common in females than males (P < 0.001).

conclusionsAttention should be paid to the presence of pulp stones and the treatment problems associated with them.

Indexed as

PrevalencePulp stonesTurkish

Identifiers

PMID24380011
PMCPMC3868126
OpenAlexW2138573925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.