Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24379846›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2013

Metoclopramide versus sumatriptan for treatment of migraine headache: A randomized clinical trial.

Saeid Talabi, Babak Masoumi, Reza Azizkhani, Mehrdad Esmailian

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hypothalamic regulation of headache and migraine.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Understanding migraine as a cycling brain syndrome: reviewing the evidence from functional imaging.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saeid TalabiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Babak MasoumiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Reza AzizkhaniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mehrdad EsmailianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are different options to manage benign headache in the emergency department. The costs, side effects, and efficacies of the drugs used are significantly different. The aim of this study was to compare intravenous (IV) metoclopramide with subcutaneous (SC) sumatriptan in treatment of migraine headache. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial study, patients presenting to the university referral emergency department with acute benign headache were allocated into two groups after obtaining their informed consent. Patients received 20 mg of IV metoclopramide or 6 mg of SC sumatriptan. Pain intensity was assessed with 10-cm visual analog scale at baseline and 60 min after treatment.

resultsOne hundred and twenty-four subjects participated. The mean age was 34.9 ± 9 years in metoclopramide group and 26.8 ± 4 years in sumatriptan group (P < 0.0001). The baseline pain scores were 6.47 ± 0.84 and 6.12 ± 0.73 in metoclopramide and sumatriptan groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). The mean of pain score decreased to 0.66 ± 0.59 cm (P < 0.0001) in the metoclopramide group and 1.1 ± 0.70 (P < 0.0001) in the sumatriptan group. Comparison of these two groups showed more pain reduction in the metoclopramide group, with a mean difference of 0.55 ± 0.13 between the groups (95% CI: 0.25-0.79 cm) (P < 0.0001).

conclusionFor treatment of migraine headache, IV metoclopramide may be superior to SC sumatriptan in the emergency department.

Indexed as

Headachemetoclopramidemigrainesumatriptan

Identifiers

PMID24379846
PMCPMC3872609
OpenAlexW2123804460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.