Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24379787›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2013

Lipid peroxidation: pathophysiological and pharmacological implications in the eye.

Ya Fatou Njie-Mbye, Madhura Kulkarni-Chitnis, Catherine A Opere, Aaron Barrett, Sunny E Ohia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Melatonin and retinal cell damage: molecular and biological functions.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neuroprotective Efficacy of Phytoconstituents of Methanolic Shoots Extract ofEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ya Fatou Njie-MbyeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University Houston, TX, USA.
Madhura Kulkarni-ChitnisDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University Houston, TX, USA.
Catherine A OpereDepartment of Pharmacy Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University Omaha, NE, USA.
Aaron BarrettDepartment of Pharmacy Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University Omaha, NE, USA.
Sunny E OhiaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University Houston, TX, USA.
Texas Southern University · USCreighton University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxygen-derived free radicals such as hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl species have been shown to oxidize phospholipids and other membrane lipid components leading to lipid peroxidation. In the eye, lipid peroxidation has been reported to play an important role in degenerative ocular diseases (age-related macular degeneration, cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy). Indeed, ocular tissues are prone to damage from reactive oxygen species due to stress from constant exposure of the eye to sunlight, atmospheric oxygen and environmental chemicals. Furthermore, free radical catalyzed peroxidation of long chain polyunsaturated acids (LCPUFAs) such as arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid leads to generation of LCPUFA metabolites including isoprostanes and neuroprostanes that may further exert pharmacological/toxicological actions in ocular tissues. Evidence from literature supports the presence of endogenous defense mechanisms against reactive oxygen species in the eye, thereby presenting new avenues for the prevention and treatment of ocular degeneration. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and synthetic peroxides can exert pharmacological and toxicological effects on tissues of the anterior uvea of several mammalian species. There is evidence suggesting that the retina, especially retinal ganglion cells can exhibit unique characteristics of antioxidant defense mechanisms. In the posterior segment of the eye, H2O2 and synthetic peroxides produce an inhibitory action on glutamate release (using [(3)H]-D-aspartate as a marker), in vitro and on the endogenous glutamate and glycine concentrations in vivo. In addition to peroxides, isoprostanes can elicit both excitatory and inhibitory effects on norepinephrine (NE) release from sympathetic nerves in isolated mammalian iris ciliary bodies. Whereas isoprostanes attenuate dopamine release from mammalian neural retina, in vitro, these novel arachidonic acid metabolites exhibit a biphasic regulatory effect on glutamate release from retina and can regulate amino acid neurotransmitter metabolism without inducing cell death in the retina. Furthermore, there appears to be an inhibitory role for neuroprostanes in the release of excitatory amino acid neurotransmitters in mammalian retina. The ability of peroxides and metabolites of LCPUFA to alter the integrity of neurotransmitter pools provides new potential target sites and pathways for the treatment of degenerative ocular diseases.

Indexed as

lipid peroxidationocular diseasesoxidative stressperoxides

Identifiers

PMID24379787
PMCPMC3863722
OpenAlexW2047351575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.