ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2013
Health care-resource utilization before and after natalizumab initiation in multiple sclerosis patients in the US.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating natalizumab first-line and later-line use in multiple sclerosis: a US claims database analysis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Patterns of multiple sclerosis presentation to the emergency department.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Assessing the Health Economic Outcomes from Commercially Insured Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Switched from Other Disease-Modifying Therapies to Teriflunomide, in the United States.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2023Article
- Health economic outcomes of switching to alemtuzumab from other disease-modifying therapies in people with multiple sclerosis in the USA.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023Observational
- Patterns of Utilization and Expenditure Across Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Claims Data from a Commercially Insured Population in the United States, 2010-2019.Neurology and therapy · 2022Article
- Disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis and subsequent health service use.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2022Article
- Disease-Modifying Drug Uptake and Health Service Use in the Ageing MS Population.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- One-Year Outcomes of an Integrated Multiple Sclerosis Disease Management Program.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2018Article
- Comparison of Disease-Modifying Therapies for the Management of Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of Healthcare Resource Utilization and Relapse Rates from US Insurance Claims Data.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2018Article
- Health care resource utilization before and after natalizumab initiation among patients with multiple sclerosis in Germany.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2017Article
- The importance of collecting structured clinical information on multiple sclerosis.BMC medicine · 2016Article
- Platform Therapy Compared with Natalizumab for Multiple Sclerosis: Relapse Rates and Time to Relapse Among Propensity Score-Matched US Patients.CNS drugs · 2015Article
- Increased relapse activity for multiple sclerosis natalizumab users who become nonpersistent: a retrospective study.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate multiple sclerosis (MS)-related health care-resource utilization and costs prior to and after initiating natalizumab in the US. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective administrative claims analysis was conducted using the Truven Health MarketScan Databases to identify adults diagnosed with MS who initiated natalizumab (index date) between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2010. Patients had ≥24 months of continuous enrollment (12 months before [preperiod] and 12 months after [postperiod] the index date) and remained on natalizumab for the 12-month postperiod. Patients with and without other disease-modifying treatment (DMT) during the preperiod were examined. Patient characteristics, MS-related inpatient stays, and corticosteroid use were compared in the pre- and postperiods using paired statistical tests, where appropriate.
resultsThe study comprised 1,458 patients, mean age 45.2 years (standard deviation 10.5), 74.2% female. The majority (70.3%) used a DMT during the preperiod. After initiating natalizumab, there was a significant reduction in the percentage of patients with MS-related inpatient stays (7.6% versus 2.4%, P<0.001), MS-related inpatient costs (median US $12,078 versus US $9,784, P<0.001), and length of stay (7.12 days versus 6.26 days, P=0.005). Both cohorts showed a reduction in the percentage of patients with MS-related inpatient stays and costs with greater reductions for patients without DMTs in the preperiod (-6.2% [P<0.001] and -US $1,496 [P=0.056], respectively) compared to those with a DMT in the preperiod (-4.8% and -US $1,262, respectively, P<0.001 for both). Compared to the preperiod, there were significant reductions in intravenous and oral corticosteroid use for natalizumab initiators (-60.1% and -52.9%, respectively, P<0.001 for both). These utilization reductions correspond to mean corticosteroid cost-per-patient reductions of -US $101 across all natalizumab users (P<0.001).
conclusionThe initiation of natalizumab was associated with significant decreases in MS-related inpatient stays, and corticosteroid use with corresponding decreases in length of stay and costs among natalizumab users with and without DMTs in the prior year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.