Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24379652›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2014

Ultraviolet damage to the eye revisited: eye-sun protection factor (E-SPF®), a new ultraviolet protection label for eyewear.

Francine Behar-Cohen, Gilles Baillet, Tito de Ayguavives, Paula Ortega Garcia, Jean Krutmann, Pablo Peña-García, Charlotte Reme, James S Wolffsohn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. An investigation into eye protection for patients receiving oral psoralen photochemotherapy (PUVA).Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Occupational exposures and age-related cataract: A review.Archives of environmental & occupational health · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Pollution free UV-C radiation to mitigate COVID-19 transmission.Gondwana research : international geoscience journal · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Francine Behar-CohenFrench Institute of Health and Medical Research, Team 17, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, France.
Gilles BailletResearch and Development Center, Essilor International, Saint Maur des Fossés, France.
Tito de AyguavivesResearch and Development Center, Essilor International, Saint Maur des Fossés, France.
Paula Ortega GarciaDepartment of Research, Fundacion Jorge Alio, Alicante, Spain.
Jean KrutmannIUF Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Pablo Peña-GarcíaDepartment of Research, Fundacion Jorge Alio, Alicante, Spain ; Division of Ophthalmology, University Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.
Charlotte RemeLaboratory of Retinal Cell Biology, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
James S WolffsohnLife and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK.
Essilor (France) · FRAston University · GBCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers · FRLeibniz Institute of Environmental Medicine · DEUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation potentially damages the skin, the immune system, and structures of the eye. A useful UV sun protection for the skin has been established. Since a remarkable body of evidence shows an association between UV radiation and damage to structures of the eye, eye protection is important, but a reliable and practical tool to assess and compare the UV-protective properties of lenses has been lacking. Among the general lay public, misconceptions on eye-sun protection have been identified. For example, sun protection is mainly ascribed to sunglasses, but less so to clear lenses. Skin malignancies in the periorbital region are frequent, but usual topical skin protection does not include the lids. Recent research utilized exact dosimetry and demonstrated relevant differences in UV burden to the eye and skin at a given ambient irradiation. Chronic UV effects on the cornea and lens are cumulative, so effective UV protection of the eyes is important for all age groups and should be used systematically. Protection of children's eyes is especially important, because UV transmittance is higher at a very young age, allowing higher levels of UV radiation to reach the crystalline lens and even the retina. Sunglasses as well as clear lenses (plano and prescription) effectively reduce transmittance of UV radiation. However, an important share of the UV burden to the eye is explained by back reflection of radiation from lenses to the eye. UV radiation incident from an angle of 135°-150° behind a lens wearer is reflected from the back side of lenses. The usual antireflective coatings considerably increase reflection of UV radiation. To provide reliable labeling of the protective potential of lenses, an eye-sun protection factor (E-SPF®) has been developed. It integrates UV transmission as well as UV reflectance of lenses. The E-SPF® compares well with established skin-sun protection factors and provides clear messages to eye health care providers and to lay consumers.

Indexed as

agingback reflectionirradiationpreventionrisk reductionsolar irradiancetransmission

Identifiers

PMID24379652
PMCPMC3872277
OpenAlexW2100303609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.