Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24379626›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Clinically detected gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are on the rise: epidemiological changes in Germany.

Hans Scherübl, Brigitte Streller, Roland Stabenow, Hermann Herbst, Michael Höpfner, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Radioligand Therapy with [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hans ScherüblHans Scherübl, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, GI Onkologie und Infektiologie, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.
Brigitte StrellerHans Scherübl, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, GI Onkologie und Infektiologie, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.
Roland StabenowHans Scherübl, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, GI Onkologie und Infektiologie, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.
Hermann HerbstHans Scherübl, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, GI Onkologie und Infektiologie, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.
Michael HöpfnerHans Scherübl, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, GI Onkologie und Infektiologie, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.
Christoph SchwertnerHans Scherübl, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, GI Onkologie und Infektiologie, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.
Joachim SteinbergHans Scherübl, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, GI Onkologie und Infektiologie, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.
Jan EickHans Scherübl, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, GI Onkologie und Infektiologie, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.
Wanda RingHans Scherübl, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, GI Onkologie und Infektiologie, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.
Krishna TiwariHans Scherübl, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, GI Onkologie und Infektiologie, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.
Sören M ZappeHans Scherübl, Christoph Schwertner, Joachim Steinberg, Jan Eick, Wanda Ring, Krishna Tiwari, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, GI Onkologie und Infektiologie, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo study the epidemiologic changes of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) in Germany, we analyzed two time periods 1976-1988 and 1998-2006.

methodsWe evaluated epidemiological data of GEP-NET from the former East German National Cancer Registry (DDR Krebsregister, 1976-1988) and its successor, the Joint Cancer Registry (GKR, 1998-2006), which was founded after German reunification. Due to a particularly substantial database the epidemiological data from the federal states of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Saxony, Brandenburg and Thuringia, covering a population of more than 10.8 million people, were analyzed. Survival probabilities were calculated using life table analysis. In addition, GEP-NET patients were evaluated for one or more second (non-GEP-NET) primary malignancies.

resultsA total of 2821 GEP neuroendocrine neoplasms were identified in the two registries. The overall incidence increased significantly between 1976 and 2006 from 0.31 (per 100.000 inhabitants per year) to 2.27 for men and from 0.57 to 2.38 for women. In the later period studied (2004-2006), the small intestine was the most common site. Neuroendocrine (NE) neoplasms of the small intestine showed the largest absolute increase in incidence, while rectal NE neoplasms exhibited the greatest relative increase. Only the incidence of appendiceal NET in women showed little change between 1976 and 2006. Overall survival of patients varied for sex, tumor site and the two periods studied but improved significantly over time. Interestingly, about 20% of the GEP-NET patients developed one or more second malignancies. Their most common location was the gastrointestinal tract. GEP-NET patients without second malignancies fared better than those with one or more of them.

conclusionThe number of detected GEP-NET increased about 5-fold in Germany between 1976 and 2006. At the same time, their anatomic distribution changed, and the survival of GEP-NET patients improved significantly. Second malignancies are common and influence the overall survival of GEP-NET patients. Thus, GEP-NET warrant our attention as well as intensive research on their tumorigenesis.

Indexed as

FemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceIntestinal NeoplasmsLife TablesMaleNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRegistriesSex DistributionSex FactorsStomach NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsEndoscopyEpidemiologyGastrinomaGerman historyInsulinomaNeuroendocrineReunificationSecond malignancyTumor

Identifiers

PMID24379626
PMCPMC3870554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.