Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24379589›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Long-term follow up of endoscopic resection for type 3 gastric NET.

Yong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Gwang Ha Kim, Jin Il Kim, Il-Kwun Chung, Sam Ryong Jee, Heung Up Kim, Geom Seog Seo, Gwang Ho Baik, Kee Don Choi and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Gastric neuroendocrine tumors: a comprehensive analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes from a reference center.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yong Hwan KwonYong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
Seong Woo JeonYong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
Gwang Ha KimYong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
Jin Il KimYong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
Il-Kwun ChungYong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
Sam Ryong JeeYong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
Heung Up KimYong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
Geom Seog SeoYong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
Gwang Ho BaikYong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
Kee Don ChoiYong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
Jeong Seop MoonYong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
Kyungpook National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo clarify the short and long-term results and to prove the usefulness of endoscopic resection in type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

methodsOf the 119 type 3 gastric NETs diagnosed from January 1996 to September 2011, 50 patients treated with endoscopic resection were enrolled in this study. For endoscopic resection, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was used. Therapeutic efficacy, complications, and follow-up results were evaluated retrospectively.

resultsEMR was performed in 41 cases and ESD in 9 cases. Pathologically complete resection was performed in 40 cases (80.0%) and incomplete resection specimens were observed in 10 cases (7 vs 3 patients in the EMR vs ESD group, P = 0.249). Upon analysis of the incomplete resection group, lateral or vertical margin invasion was found in six cases (14.6%) in the EMR group and in one case in the ESD group (11.1%). Lymphovascular invasions were observed in two cases (22.2%) in the ESD group and in one case (2.4%) in the EMR group (P = 0.080). During the follow-up period (43.73; 13-60 mo), there was no evidence of tumor recurrence in either the pathologically complete resection group or the incomplete resection group. No recurrence was reported during follow-up. In addition, no mortality was reported in either the complete resection group or the incomplete resection group for the duration of the follow-up period.

conclusionLess than 2 cm sized confined submucosal layer type 3 gastric NET with no evidence of lymphovascular invasion, endoscopic treatment could be considered at initial treatment.

Indexed as

GastroscopyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoid TumorFemaleGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPatient SelectionRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTime FactorsCarcinoidEndoscopic resectionNeuroendocrine tumorStomachTreatment

Identifiers

PMID24379589
PMCPMC3870517
OpenAlexW2150928782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.