Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24379582›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Clostridium difficile-associated disease: adherence with current guidelines at a tertiary medical center.

Bryan F Curtin, Yousef Zarbalian, Mark H Flasar, Erik von Rosenvinge

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient Outcomes With Prevented vs NegativeOpen forum infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for the management of Clostridium difficile infection in Japan: a multicenter retrospective study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bryan F CurtinBryan F Curtin, Yousef Zarbalian, Resident in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.
Yousef ZarbalianBryan F Curtin, Yousef Zarbalian, Resident in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.
Mark H FlasarBryan F Curtin, Yousef Zarbalian, Resident in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.
Erik von RosenvingeBryan F Curtin, Yousef Zarbalian, Resident in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess adherence with the the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA)/ the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for management of Clostridium difficile (C. difficile)-associated disease (CDAD) at a tertiary medical center.

methodsAll positive C. difficile stool toxin assays in adults between May 2010 and May 2011 at the University of Maryland Medical Center were identified. CDAD episodes were classified as guideline adherent or non-adherent and these two groups were compared to determine demographic and clinical factors predictive of adherence. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of multiple predictors on guideline adherence.

results320 positive C. difficile stool tests were identified in 290 patients. Stratified by disease severity criteria set forth by the SHEA/IDSA guidelines, 42.2% of cases were mild-moderate, 48.1% severe, and 9.7% severe-complicated. Full adherence with the guidelines was observed in only 43.4% of cases. Adherence was 65.9% for mild-moderate CDAD, which was significantly better than in severe cases (25.3%) or severe-complicated cases (35.5%) (P < 0.001). There was no difference in demographics, hospitalization, ICU exposure, recurrence or 30-d mortality between adherent and non-adherent groups. A multivariate model revealed significantly decreased adherence for severe or severe-complicated episodes (OR = 0.18, 95%CI: 0.11-0.30) and recurrent episodes (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.23-0.95).

conclusionOverall adherence with the SHEA/IDSA guidelines for management of CDAD at a tertiary medical center was poor; this was most pronounced in severe, severe-complicated and recurrent cases. Educational interventions aimed at improving guideline adherence are warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBaltimoreClostridioides difficileCross InfectionEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFecesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAdherence to the Infectious Diseases Society of America GuidelinesClostridium difficileHospital Acquired InfectionsMetronidazoleVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID24379582
PMCPMC3870510
OpenAlexW2088524469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.