Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24379378›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

In vitro selection with artificial expanded genetic information systems.

Kwame Sefah, Zunyi Yang, Kevin M Bradley, Shuichi Hoshika, Elizabeth Jiménez, Liqin Zhang, Guizhi Zhu, Savita Shanker, Fahong Yu, Diane Turek and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed, 321 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Reverse transcription as key step in RNARSC chemical biology · 2024
    Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kwame SefahDepartment of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
Zunyi Yang
Kevin M Bradley
Shuichi Hoshika
Elizabeth Jiménez
Liqin Zhang
Guizhi Zhu
Savita Shanker
Fahong Yu
Diane Turek
Weihong Tan
Steven A Benner
Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Florida Health · USState Key Laboratory of Chemobiosensing and Chemometrics

Funding

Development of molecular probes for biomedical applicationsR01GM079359 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI TAN, WEIHONG · 2007 to 2016
$2.3M
Molecular Target for Liver Cancer Diagnosis and TherapyR01CA133086 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LIU, CHEN · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Enrichment and Detection of Exfoliated Cancer CellsR21CA122648 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI TAN, WEIHONG · 2007 to 2008
$325k
NCI NIH HHS CA133086NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133086NCI NIH HHS R21 CA122648NCI NIH HHS R21CA122648NIGMS NIH HHS GM079359NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificially expanded genetic information systems (AEGISs) are unnatural forms of DNA that increase the number of independently replicating nucleotide building blocks. To do this, AEGIS pairs are joined by different arrangements of hydrogen bond donor and acceptor groups, all while retaining their Watson-Crick geometries. We report here a unique case where AEGIS DNA has been used to execute a systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) experiment. This AEGIS-SELEX was designed to create AEGIS oligonucleotides that bind to a line of breast cancer cells. AEGIS-SELEX delivered an AEGIS aptamer (ZAP-2012) built from six different kinds of nucleotides (the standard G, A, C, and T, and the AEGIS nonstandard P and Z nucleotides, the last having a nitro functionality not found in standard DNA). ZAP-2012 has a dissociation constant of 30 nM against these cells. The affinity is diminished or lost when Z or P (or both) is replaced by standard nucleotides and compares well with affinities of standard GACT aptamers selected against cell lines using standard SELEX. The success of AEGIS-SELEX relies on various innovations, including (i) the ability to synthesize GACTZP libraries, (ii) polymerases that PCR amplify GACTZP DNA with little loss of the AEGIS nonstandard nucleotides, and (iii) technologies to deep sequence GACTZP DNA survivors. These results take the next step toward expanding the power and utility of SELEX and offer an AEGIS-SELEX that could possibly generate receptors, ligands, and catalysts having sequence diversities nearer to that displayed by proteins.

Indexed as

Information SystemsSelection, GeneticBase SequenceDNA PrimersPolymerase Chain ReactionSELEX Aptamer TechniqueDNA Primerscancer cell SELEXnext generation sequencingnucleic acidssynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID24379378
PMCPMC3910645
OpenAlexW1986326400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.