ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014
In vitro activity of solithromycin against erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus agalactiae.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial Resistance Profile and Associated Factors of Group B Streptococci Colonization among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinics in Jigjiga, Southeast Ethiopia.International journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Comparison of solithromycin with erythromycin in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from China: antibacterial activity, clonality, resistance mechanism, and inhibition of biofilm formation.The Journal of antibiotics · 2021Article
- Molecular Characterization ofJournal of tropical medicine · 2020Article
- Antibiotic Resistance and Molecular Epidemiological Characteristics ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2020Article
- Spotlight on solithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: design, development, and potential place in therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2017Review
- Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline at the end of 2015.The Journal of antibiotics · 2017Review
- Solithromycin: A Novel Fluoroketolide for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia.Drugs · 2016Review
- What's old is new: Reconfiguring known antibiotics to fight drug resistance.Nature medicine · 2016Article
- A New, Potent, and Placenta-Permeable Macrolide Antibiotic, Solithromycin, for the Prevention and Treatment of Bacterial Infections in Pregnancy.Frontiers in immunology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The in vitro antibacterial activity of solithromycin (CEM-101) against macrolide-resistant isolates (n=62) of Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus [GBS]) was determined. Phenotypic characterization of macrolide-resistant strains was performed by double-disc diffusion testing. A multiplex PCR was used to identify the erm(B), erm(TR), and mef(A/E) genes, capsular genotypes, and alpha-like (Alp) protein genes from the GBS strains. Determination of MIC was carried out using the microdilution broth method. The Etest method was used for penicillin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin. Solithromycin had a MIC50 of ≤0.008 μg/ml and a MIC90 of 0.015 μg/ml against macrolide-susceptible S. agalactiae. These MICs were lower than those displayed by penicillin (MIC50 of 0.032 μg/ml and MIC90 of 0.047 μg/ml), the antibiotic agent of choice for prophylaxis and treatment of GBS infections. Against macrolide-resistant S. agalactiae, solithromycin had a MIC50 of 0.03 μg/ml and a MIC90 of 0.125 μg/ml. Against erm(B) strains, solithromycin had a MIC50 of 0.03 μg/ml and a MIC90 of 0.06 μg/ml, while against mef(A) strains, it had a MIC50 of 0.03 μg/ml and a MIC90 of 0.125 μg/ml. Most erythromycin-resistant GBS strains were of serotype V (64.5%) and associated significantly with alp2-3. Moreover, a statistically significant association was observed between the constitutive macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance (cMLSB) phenotype and the erm(B) gene-carrying strains, the alp2-3 gene and the M phenotype, and the mef(A/E) gene and epsilon. Overall, our results show that solithromycin had lower or similar MICs than penicillin and potent activity against macrolide-resistant strains independent of their genotype or phenotype, representing a valid therapeutic alternative where β-lactams cannot be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.