Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24377069›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2013

Comparative immediate functional outcomes among cryotherapeutic interventions at the ankle.

Emily E Williams, Sayers J Miller, Wayne J Sebastianelli, Giampietro L Vairo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The effects of cryotherapy on proprioception system.BioMed research international · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily E WilliamsPenn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Sayers J MillerPenn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Wayne J SebastianelliPenn State Hershey Bone and Joint Institute, State College, PA, USA.
Giampietro L Vairo
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

backgroundThere is a lack of evidence detailing the immediate effects of different cryotherapy interventions at the ankle on functional outcomes such as balance and jumping tasks in a physically active population; therefore, the purpose of the present study is to compare the immediate effects of varied modes of cryotherapy applications to the ankle joint on Star Excursion Balance Test and vertical jump height performance. The authors hypothesized that cryotherapy would acutely decrease performance when compared to a control, and that concomitant compression would further hinder outcomes.

methodsA crossover study was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting. Thirty (9 men, 21 women) participants (20.6 ± 1.0 years, 1.7 ± 0.1 m, 67.5 ± 11.7 kg) were enrolled. The independent variable was treatment mode; no ice, ice without compression and ice with compression. Dependent variables included center of pressure (COP) excursions, dynamic balance reach distances and vertical jump height for the dominant leg. Participants underwent three separate testing sessions separated by 72-hour rest intervals. The order of treatment and performance measures was randomized to prevent order effects. Normalized dynamic balance reach distances were assessed using the reliable modified Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT). Center of pressure path length was assessed via a force platform during a single-legged static balance task under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Relative vertical jump height was assessed using a single-legged vertical hop test. Group means and standard deviations were calculated by treatment mode. One-way analyses of variance with Tukey's post hoc test were used to calculate differences among treatment modes. p < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.

resultsNo statistically significant differences existed for all the performance measures among treatment modes.

conclusionsThese findings suggest no immediate differences in lower extremity performance outcome measures between the respective treatment modes applied to the ankle in a young, healthy and physically active population. Additional investigation is warranted to study the related delayed effects of these interventions. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Anklebalancecryotherapyfunctional performance

Identifiers

PMID24377069
PMCPMC3867076
OpenAlexW114821733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.