Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24376890›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Pollinator-mediated selection on flower color, flower scent and flower morphology of Hemerocallis: evidence from genotyping individual pollen grains on the stigma.

Shun K Hirota, Kozue Nitta, Yoshihisa Suyama, Nobumitsu Kawakubo, Akiko A Yasumoto, Tetsukazu Yahara

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cellular innovations and diversity in the lepidopteran compound eye.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Molecular Characterization and Expression Patterns of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  6. UV bullseye contrast ofEcology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shun K HirotaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kozue NittaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshihisa SuyamaField Science Center, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Osaki, Miyagi, Japan.
Nobumitsu KawakuboDepartment of Environmental Science, Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Akiko A YasumotoDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tetsukazu YaharaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To trace the fate of individual pollen grains through pollination processes, we determined genotypes of single pollen grains deposited on Hemerocallis stigmas in an experimental mixed-species array. Hemerocallis fulva, pollinated by butterflies, has diurnal, reddish and unscented flowers, and H. citrina, pollinated by hawkmoths, has nocturnal, yellowish and sweet scent flowers. We observed pollinator visits to an experimental array of 24 H. fulva and 12 F2 hybrids between the two species (H. fulva and H. citrina) and collected stigmas after every trip bout of swallowtail butterflies or hawkmoths. We then measured selection by swallowtail butterflies or hawkmoths through male and female components of pollination success as determined by single pollen genotyping. As expected, swallowtail butterflies imposed selection on reddish color and weak scent: the number of outcross pollen grains acquired is a quadratic function of flower color with the maximum at reddish color, and the combined pollination success was maximal at weak scent (almost unrecognizable for human). This explains why H. fulva, with reddish flowers and no recognizable scent, is mainly pollinated by swallowtail butterflies. However, we found no evidence of hawkmoths-mediated selection on flower color or scent. Our findings do not support a hypothesis that yellow flower color and strong scent intensity, the distinctive floral characteristics of H. citrina, having evolved in adaptations to hawkmoths. We suggest that the key trait that triggers the evolution of nocturnal flowers is flowering time rather than flower color and scent.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsButterfliesCrosses, GeneticFlowersGenotypeHemerocallisJapanMothsOdorantsPigmentationPollenPollinationPolymerase Chain ReactionSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID24376890
PMCPMC3871637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.