Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24376822›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy varies in the treatment of women with invasive breast cancer.

Adedayo A Onitilo, Jill K Onesti, Richard M Single, Jessica M Engel, Ted A James, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Heather Spencer Feigelson, Tom Barney, Laurence E McCahill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Drug utilization and expenditure of anticancer drugs for breast cancer.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Adedayo A OnitiloDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Marshfield Clinic, Weston, Wisconsin, USA and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jill K OnestiGrand Rapids Medical Education Partners, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Richard M SingleUniversity of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.
Jessica M EngelMarshfield Clinic Cancer Care at St Michaels Hospital, Stevens Point, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Ted A JamesUniversity of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.
Erin J Aiello BowlesGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Heather Spencer FeigelsonKaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Tom BarneyVan Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America.
Laurence E McCahillVan Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America.
University of Vermont · USVan Andel Institute · USKaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USMarshfield Clinic · USUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has made it possible for some women to be successfully treated with breast conservation therapy (BCT ) who were initially considered ineligible. Factors related to current practice patterns of NAC use are important to understand particularly as the surgical treatment of invasive breast cancer has changed. The goal of this study was to determine variations in neoadjuvant chemotherapy use in a large multi-center national database of patients with breast cancer.

methodsWe evaluated NAC use in patients with initially operable invasive breast cancer and potential impact on breast conservation rates. Records of 2871 women ages 18-years and older diagnosed with 2907 invasive breast cancers from January 2003 to December 2008 at four institutions across the United States were examined using the Breast Cancer Surgical Outcomes (BRCASO) database. Main outcome measures included NAC use and association with pre-operatively identified clinical factors, surgical approach (partial mastectomy [PM] or total mastectomy [TM]), and BCT failure (initial PM followed by subsequent TM).

resultsOverall, NAC utilization was 3.8%l. Factors associated with NAC use included younger age, pre-operatively known positive nodal status, and increasing clinical tumor size. NAC use and BCT failure rates increased with clinical tumor size, and there was significant variation in NAC use across institutions. Initial TM frequency approached initial PM frequency for tumors >30-40 mm; BCT failure rate was 22.7% for tumors >40 mm. Only 2.7% of patients undergoing initial PM and 7.2% undergoing initial TM received NAC.

conclusionsNAC use in this study was infrequent and varied among institutions. Infrequent NAC use in patients suggests that NAC may be underutilized in eligible patients desiring breast conservation.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMultivariate AnalysisNeoadjuvant TherapyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24376822
PMCPMC3869842
OpenAlexW2051284771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.