Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24376802›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Identification of a population of epidermal squamous cell carcinoma cells with enhanced potential for tumor formation.

Gautam Adhikary, Dan Grun, Candace Kerr, Sivaprakasam Balasubramanian, Ellen A Rorke, Mohan Vemuri, Shayne Boucher, Jackie R Bickenbach, Thomas Hornyak, Wen Xu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Enhancing Transcutaneous Drug Delivery: Advanced Perspectives on Skin Models.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ACTL6A suppresses p21Oncogene · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gautam AdhikaryDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Dan GrunDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Candace KerrDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Sivaprakasam BalasubramanianDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Ellen A RorkeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Mohan VemuriLife Technologies, Inc. Stem Cell Technologies, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Shayne BoucherLife Technologies, Inc. Stem Cell Technologies, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Jackie R BickenbachDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Thomas HornyakDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America ; Department of Dermatology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Wen XuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Matthew L FisherDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Richard L EckertDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America ; Department of Dermatology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America ; Department of Reproductive Biology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America ; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America ; The Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND GREENEBAUM CANCER CENTERSUPPORT GRANTP30CA134274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FEYRUZ VIRGILIA RASSOOL · 2008 to 2026
$51.0M
Polycomb proteins and skin cancer preventionR01CA131074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ECKERT, RICHARD L. · 2008 to 2017
$4.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA134274NCI NIH HHS P30CA134274NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131074NCI NIH HHS R01CA131074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermal squamous cell carcinoma is among the most common cancers in humans. These tumors are comprised of phenotypically diverse populations of cells that display varying potential for proliferation and differentiation. An important goal is identifying cells from this population that drive tumor formation. To enrich for tumor-forming cells, cancer cells were grown as spheroids in non-attached conditions. We show that spheroid-selected cells form faster growing and larger tumors in immune-compromised mice as compared to non-selected cells. Moreover, spheroid-selected cells gave rise to tumors following injection of as few as one hundred cells, suggesting these cells have enhanced tumor-forming potential. Cells isolated from spheroid-selected tumors retain an enhanced ability to grow as spheroids when grown in non-attached culture conditions. Thus, these tumor-forming cells retain their phenotype following in vivo passage as tumors. Detailed analysis reveals that spheroid-selected cultures are highly enriched for expression of epidermal stem cell and embryonic stem cell markers, including aldehyde dehydrogenase 1, keratin 15, CD200, keratin 19, Oct4, Bmi-1, Ezh2 and trimethylated histone H3. These studies indicate that a subpopulation of cells that possess stem cell-like properties and express stem cell markers can be derived from human epidermal cancer cells and that these cells display enhanced ability to drive tumor formation.

Indexed as

Epidermal CellsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Culture TechniquesCell Transformation, NeoplasticHumansImmunoblottingMiceNeoplastic Stem CellsSpheroids, CellularBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID24376802
PMCPMC3869846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.