Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24376800›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

A mutant Brassica napus (canola) population for the identification of new genetic diversity via TILLING and next generation sequencing.

Erin J Gilchrist, Christine H D Sidebottom, Chu Shin Koh, Tanya Macinnes, Andrew G Sharpe, George W Haughn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond Resistance Genes: Silencing Susceptibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perspectives for integrated insect pest protection in oilseed rape breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A simple and efficientPlant direct · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Manipulation of crossover frequency and distribution for plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. FANCM Limits Meiotic Crossovers in Brassica Crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  13. Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erin J GilchristDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Christine H D SidebottomNational Research Council Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Chu Shin KohNational Research Council Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Tanya MacinnesDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Andrew G SharpeNational Research Council Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
George W HaughnDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CANational Research Council Canada · CASaskatchewan Research Council (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have generated a Brassica napus (canola) population of 3,158 EMS-mutagenised lines and used TILLING to demonstrate that the population has a high enough mutation density that it will be useful for identification of mutations in genes of interest in this important crop species. TILLING is a reverse genetics technique that has been successfully used in many plant and animal species. Classical TILLING involves the generation of a mutagenised population, followed by screening of DNA samples using a mismatch-specific endonuclease that cleaves only those PCR products that carry a mutation. Polyacrylamide gel detection is then used to visualise the mutations in any gene of interest. We have used this TILLING technique to identify 432 unique mutations in 26 different genes in B. napus (canola cv. DH12075). This reflects a mutation density ranging from 1/56 kb to 1/308 kb (depending on the locus) with an average of 1/109 kb. We have also successfully verified the utility of next generation sequencing technology as a powerful approach for the identification of rare mutations in a population of plants, even in polyploid species such as B. napus. Most of the mutants we have identified are publically available.

Indexed as

Base SequenceBrassica napusDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA PrimersElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelGenetic VariationMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesisMutation RateDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID24376800
PMCPMC3869819
OpenAlexW2118272433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.