Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24376665›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Protective oral vaccination against infectious bursal disease virus using the major viral antigenic protein VP2 produced in Pichia pastoris.

Omid Taghavian, Holger Spiegel, Rüdiger Hauck, Hafez M Hafez, Rainer Fischer, Stefan Schillberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Yeast oral vaccines against infectious diseases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Omid TaghavianFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Aachen, Germany.
Holger SpiegelFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Aachen, Germany.
Rüdiger HauckInstitute of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hafez M HafezInstitute of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rainer FischerFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Aachen, Germany ; Institute for Molecular Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Stefan SchillbergFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Aachen, Germany ; Institute for Phytopathology and Applied Zoology, Phytopathology Department, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) causes economically important immunosuppressive disease in young chickens. The self-assembling capsid protein (VP2) from IBDV strain IR01 was expressed in Pichia pastoris resulting in the formation of homomeric, 23-nm infectious bursal disease subviral particles (IBD-SVPs) with a yield of 76 mg/l before and 38 mg/l after purification. Anti-IBDV antibodies were detected in chickens injected with purified IBD-SVPs or fed with either purified IBD-SVPs or inactivated P. pastoris cells containing IBD-VP2 (cell-encapsulated). Challenge studies using the heterologous classical IBDV strain (MB3) showed that intramuscular vaccination with 20 µg purified IBD-SVPs conferred full protection, achieved complete virus clearance and prevented bursal damage and atrophy, compared with only 40% protection, 0-10% virus clearance accompanied by severe atrophy and substantial bursal damage in mock-vaccinated and challenge controls. The commercial IBDV vaccine also conferred full protection and achieved complete virus clearance, albeit with partial bursal atrophy. Oral administration of 500 µg purified IBD-SVPs with and without adjuvant conferred 100% protection but achieved only 60% virus clearance with adjuvant and none without it. Moderate bursal damage was observed in both cases but the inclusion of adjuvant resulted in bursal atrophy similar to that observed with live-attenuated vaccine and parenteral administration of 20 µg purified IBD-SVPs. The oral administration of 250 mg P. pastoris cells containing IBD-VP2 resulted in 100% protection with adjuvant and 60% without, accompanied by moderate bursal damage and atrophy in both groups, whereas 25 mg P. pastoris cells containing IBD-VP2 resulted in 90-100% protection with moderate bursal lesions and severe atrophy. Finally, the oral delivery of 50 µg purified IBD-SVPs achieved 40-60% protection with severe bursal lesions and atrophy. Both oral and parenteral administration of yeast-derived IBD-VP2 can therefore induce a specific and protective immune response against IBDV without affecting the growth rate of chickens.

Indexed as

VaccinationAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, OralAnimalsAntibodies, ViralBirnaviridae InfectionsBursa of FabriciusChickensDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicInfectious bursal disease virusInjections, IntramuscularPichiaPoultry DiseasesVaccines, SyntheticViral Structural ProteinsViral VaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, ViralVaccines, SyntheticViral Structural ProteinsViral VaccinesVP2 protein, infectious bursal disease virus

Identifiers

PMID24376665
PMCPMC3869785
OpenAlexW1979702301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.