Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24376664›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Individual variations in serum melatonin levels through time: implications for epidemiologic studies.

Leticia M Nogueira, Joshua N Sampson, Lisa W Chu, Kai Yu, Gerald Andriole, Timothy Church, Frank Z Stanczyk, Jill Koshiol, Ann W Hsing

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. In Reply: Trough Melatonin Levels Have No Physiological or Clinical Relevance.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Leticia M NogueiraDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Joshua N SampsonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Lisa W ChuCancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, California, United States of America.
Kai YuDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Gerald AndrioleDivision of Urological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Timothy ChurchDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Frank Z StanczykDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Jill KoshiolDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Ann W HsingCancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, California, United States of America.
National Cancer Institute · USCancer Prevention Institute of California · USDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsMinnesota Department of Health · USUniversity of Southern California · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melatonin, a marker for the circadian rhythm with serum levels peaking between 2AM and 5AM, is hypothesized to possess anti-cancer properties, making it a mechanistic candidate for the probable carcinogenic effect of circadian rhythm disruption. In order to weigh epidemiologic evidence on the association of melatonin with cancer, we must first understand the laboratory and biological sources of variability in melatonin levels measured in samples. Participants for this methodological study were men enrolled in the Prostate Lung Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO). We measured serum melatonin levels over a five year period in 97 individuals to test if melatonin levels are steady over time. The Pearson correlation coefficient between two measures separated by 1 year was 0.87, while the correlation between two measures separated by 5 years was to 0.70. In an additional cross-sectional study of 292 individuals, we used Analysis of Variance to identify differences in melatonin levels between different lifestyle and environmental characteristics. Serum melatonin levels were slightly higher in samples collected from 130 individuals during the winter, (6.36±0.59 pg/ml) than in samples collected from 119 individuals during the summer (4.83±0.62 pg/ml). Serum melatonin levels were lowest in current smokers (3.02±1.25 pg/ml, p = 0.007) compared to never (6.66±0.66 pg/ml) and former (5.59±0.50 pg/ml) smokers whereas BMI did not significantly affect serum melatonin levels in this study. In conclusion, the high 5 year correlation of melatonin levels implies that single measurements may be used to detect population level associations between melatonin and risk of cancer. Furthermore, our results reiterate the need to record season of sample collection, and individual characteristics in order to maximize study power and prevent confounding.

Indexed as

AgedBody Mass IndexCircadian RhythmHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMelatoninMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhotoperiodRisk FactorsSeasonsSmokingMelatonin

Identifiers

PMID24376664
PMCPMC3871612
OpenAlexW2045290224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.