Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24376564›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

RAPID-SELEX for RNA aptamers.

Kylan Szeto, David R Latulippe, Abdullah Ozer, John M Pagano, Brian S White, David Shalloway, John T Lis, Harold G Craighead

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Therapeutic Applications of Aptamers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Aptamer Applications in Neuroscience.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Updates on Aptamer Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Revealing protein-lncRNA interaction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kylan SzetoSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
David R LatulippeSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Abdullah OzerDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
John M PaganoDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Brian S WhiteDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
David ShallowayDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
John T LisDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Harold G CraigheadSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.

Funding

Development of High Throughput Aptamer-based Protein Capture/Detection Assays towR01GM090320 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CRAIGHEAD, HAROLD G, JIN, MOONSOO M. · 2009 to 2013
$3.4M
In vivo Detection and Imaging of Epigenetic Histone Modifications and Modifying ER01DA030329 · NIDA · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CRAIGHEAD, HAROLD G, LIN, HENING · 2010 to 2014
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS DA030329NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030329NIGMS NIH HHS GM090320NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aptamers are high-affinity ligands selected from DNA or RNA libraries via SELEX, a repetitive in vitro process of sequential selection and amplification steps. RNA SELEX is more complicated than DNA SELEX because of the additional transcription and reverse transcription steps. Here, we report a new selection scheme, RAPID-SELEX (RNA Aptamer Isolation via Dual-cycles SELEX), that simplifies this process by systematically skipping unnecessary amplification steps. Using affinity microcolumns, we were able to complete a multiplex selection for protein targets, CHK2 and UBLCP1, in a third of the time required for analogous selections using a conventional SELEX approach. High-throughput sequencing of the enriched pools from both RAPID and SELEX revealed many identical candidate aptamers from the starting pool of 5 × 10(15) sequences. For CHK2, the same sequence was preferentially enriched in both selections as the top candidate and was found to bind to its respective target. These results demonstrate the efficiency and, most importantly, the robustness of our selection scheme. RAPID provides a generalized approach that can be used with any selection technology to accelerate the rate of aptamer discovery, without compromising selection performance.

Indexed as

Aptamers, NucleotideBase SequenceCheckpoint Kinase 2High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSELEX Aptamer TechniqueAptamers, NucleotideCheckpoint Kinase 2

Identifiers

PMID24376564
PMCPMC3869713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.