Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24376563›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

Comparative efficacy and safety of deferoxamine, deferiprone and deferasirox on severe thalassemia: a meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials.

Sujian Xia, Weidong Zhang, Liting Huang, Hong Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Iron overload cardiomyopathy.Heart failure reviews · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cardiac Dysfunction in β-Thalassemia: A Narrative Review.Research in heart yield and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The functional role of hemojuvelin in acute ischemic stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Economic Evaluation of Chelation Regimens for β-Thalassemia Major: a Systematic Review.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sujian XiaDivision of Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, University of Jinan, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, China.
Weidong ZhangNovartis Pharmaceuticals Oncology, Beijing, China.
Liting HuangZhuhai People's Hospital, Zhuhai City, Guangdong, China.
Hong JiangDivision of Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, University of Jinan, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, China.
Jinan University · CNNovartis (China) · CNUniversity of Jinan · CNZhuhai People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of three main iron chelators, namely, deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP) and deferasirox (DFX) for thalassemia major (TM) patients.

methodsRandomized controlled trials comparing mono-therapy DFO, DFP, DFX and combined DFP with DFO therapy in TM patients from January 1990 to December 2012 were searched and selected. Two independent authors assessed data from extracted randomized trials for efficacy and safety in the measurements of serum ferritin (SF), live iron concentration (LIC), myocardial iron content (MIC), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and adverse events (AEs).

resultsSixteen studies were selected. In the comparison of DFP versus DFO treatment groups, a significant difference was revealed on MIC and LVEF (P=0.01 and P=0.007, respectively) but not on SF or LIC level (P=0.65 and P=0.37, respectively). In comparing combined therapy (DFP plus DFO) versus DFO, a significant difference was shown on MIC and LVEF measurements (P<0.00001 and P=0.003, respectively), but not on SF or LIC levels (P=0.93 and P=0.62, respectively). Moreover, the combined DFP with DFO treatment had significantly higher risk than DFO treatment (RR 1.46 with 95%CI 1.04 to 2.04). When comparing DFX with DFO, a significant difference was shown on the SF level (P=0.003), and there was no difference between DFX and DFO in safety evaluation (RR 1.53 with 95%CI 0.31 to 7.49).

conclusionFindings indicated that the most effective and safe iron chelators remains to be proven, and further large-scale, long-term studies are needed.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicBenzoatesDeferasiroxDeferiproneDeferoxamineFerritinsHumansIronIron Chelating AgentsLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocardiumPyridonesStroke VolumeThalassemiaTreatment OutcomeBenzoatesDeferasiroxDeferiproneDeferoxamineFerritinsIronIron Chelating AgentsPyridonesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID24376563
PMCPMC3871701
OpenAlexW2019760194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.