Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24376553›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Prestin regulation and function in residual outer hair cells after noise-induced hearing loss.

Anping Xia, Yohan Song, Rosalie Wang, Simon S Gao, Will Clifton, Patrick Raphael, Sung-il Chao, Fred A Pereira, Andrew K Groves, John S Oghalai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Pathway Potentiates Cochlear Amplification in Response to Hearing Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bilirubin Encephalopathy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anping XiaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Yohan SongDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Rosalie WangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Simon S GaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America ; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Will CliftonBobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Patrick RaphaelDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Sung-il ChaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America ; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chosun University, Gwangju, South Korea.
Fred A PereiraBobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Andrew K GrovesDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America ; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America ; Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
John S OghalaiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Stanford University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USChosun University · KRRice University · US

Funding

INTRACOCHLEAR ELECTROCHEMICAL GRADIENTSR01DC000354 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNELL, WILLIAM E, FARRELL, BRENDA FRANCES · 1989 to 2018
$10.4M
Genetic Regulation of Cochlear DevelopmentR01DC006185 · NIDCD · HOUSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GROVES, ANDREW K · 2003 to 2014
$3.6M
Stanford OHNS Core CenterP30DC010363 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RICCI, ANTHONY J · 2009 to 2016
$3.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCD NIH HHS DC006185NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC010363NIDCD NIH HHS P30DC010363NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outer hair cell (OHC) motor protein prestin is necessary for electromotility, which drives cochlear amplification and produces exquisitely sharp frequency tuning. Tecta(C1509G) transgenic mice have hearing loss, and surprisingly have increased OHC prestin levels. We hypothesized, therefore, that prestin up-regulation may represent a generalized response to compensate for a state of hearing loss. In the present study, we sought to determine the effects of noise-induced hearing loss on prestin expression. After noise exposure, we performed cytocochleograms and observed OHC loss only in the basal region of the cochlea. Next, we patch clamped OHCs from the apical turn (9-12 kHz region), where no OHCs were lost, in noise-exposed and age-matched control mice. The non-linear capacitance was significantly higher in noise-exposed mice, consistent with higher functional prestin levels. We then measured prestin protein and mRNA levels in whole-cochlea specimens. Both Western blot and qPCR studies demonstrated increased prestin expression after noise exposure. Finally, we examined the effect of the prestin increase in vivo following noise damage. Immediately after noise exposure, ABR and DPOAE thresholds were elevated by 30-40 dB. While most of the temporary threshold shifts recovered within 3 days, there were additional improvements over the next month. However, DPOAE magnitudes, basilar membrane vibration, and CAP tuning curve measurements from the 9-12 kHz cochlear region demonstrated no differences between noise-exposed mice and control mice. Taken together, these data indicate that prestin is up-regulated by 32-58% in residual OHCs after noise exposure and that the prestin is functional. These findings are consistent with the notion that prestin increases in an attempt to partially compensate for reduced force production because of missing OHCs. However, in regions where there is no OHC loss, the cochlea is able to compensate for the excess prestin in order to maintain stable auditory thresholds and frequency discrimination.

Indexed as

AnimalsCochlear Microphonic PotentialsEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemGene Expression RegulationHair Cells, Auditory, OuterHearing Loss, Noise-InducedMiceModels, BiologicalMolecular Motor ProteinsNoiseOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousPatch-Clamp TechniquesRNA, MessengerMolecular Motor ProteinsPres protein, mouseRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24376553
PMCPMC3869702
OpenAlexW1985425380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.