ArticlePloS one2013
Does gender inequity increase the risk of intimate partner violence among women? Evidence from a national Bangladeshi sample.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnitude and correlates of intimate partner violence against female garment workers from selected factories in Bangladesh.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Gender-based discrimination towards cisgender women in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of definitions and measures used in the health literature.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Assessing the impacts of women's autonomy on their approval of intimate partner violence: a nationwide cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Polygyny and intimate partner violence among married women: Sub-national estimates from a cross-sectional study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Association Between Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and Women's Attitudes Toward Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-2018.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Is gender a factor in socioeconomic disparities in undiagnosed, and untreated hypertension in Bangladesh?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Article
- How does empowering men affect intimate partner violence? Evidence from Bangladesh.SSM - population health · 2024Article
- Intimate Partner Violence, prevalence and its consequences: a community-based study in Gambella, Ethiopia.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Mental healthcare-seeking behavior of women in Bangladesh: content analysis of a social media platform.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Intersectional inequalities in younger women's experiences of physical intimate partner violence across communities in Bangladesh.International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
- Prevalence and determinants of wife-beating in Bangladesh: evidence from a nationwide survey.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- The Role of Violence Acceptance and Inequitable Gender Norms in Intimate Partner Violence Severity Among Couples in Zambia.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2021Article
- Empowerment dimensions and their relationship with continuum care for maternal health in Bangladesh.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Experience of Intimate Partner Violence among Women in Sexual Unions: Is Supportive Attitude of Women towards Intimate Partner Violence a Correlate?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Polygyny and intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from 16 cross-sectional demographic and health surveys.SSM - population health · 2021Article
- A true face of Indian married couples: Effect of age and education on control over own sexuality and sexual violence.PloS one · 2021Article
- Does gender inequality matter for access to and utilization of maternal healthcare services in Bangladesh?PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence from developing countries regarding the association between gender inequity and intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization in women has been suggestive but inconclusive. Using nationally representative population-based data from Bangladesh, we examined the association between multidimensional aspects of gender inequity and the risk of IPV.
methodsWe used data from the 2007 Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey. The analyses were based on the responses of 4,467 married women. The main explanatory variable was gender inequity, which reflects the multidimensional aspects of women's autonomy and the relationship inequality between women and their partner. The experience of physical and/or sexual IPV was the main outcome variable of interest.
resultsOver 53% of married Bangladeshi women experienced physical and/or sexual violence from their husbands. In the adjusted models, women who had a higher level of autonomy (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.48; 99% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.61), a particularly high level of economic-decision-making autonomy (AOR 0.12; 99% CI 0.08-0.17), and a higher level of non-supportive attitudes towards wife beating or raping (AOR 0.61; 99% CI 0.47-0.83) were less likely to report having experienced IPV. Education level, age at marriage, and occupational discrepancy between spouses were also found to be significant predictors of IPV.
conclusionsIn conclusion, dimensions of gender inequities were significant predictors of IPV among married women in Bangladesh. An investigation of the causal link between multidimensional aspects of gender inequity and IPV will be critical to developing interventions to reduce the risk of IPV and should be considered a public health research priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.