Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24376516›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cytology and HPV testing for cervical cancer screening: findings from a pilot study.

Heidi E Jones, Mahesh M Mansukhani, Guo-Xia Tong, Carolyn L Westhoff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00702208 (The Feasibility and Acceptability of Using the Delphi Screener for Cervical Cytology Testing Among Low Income Women in New York City), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00702208 phase2completednot on this map

The Feasibility and Acceptability of Using the Delphi Screener for Cervical Cytology Testing Among Low Income Women in New York City

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2008 to 2010Enrolled198ConditionsCervical NeoplasiaArmsDelphi Screener
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heidi E JonesDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America ; Epidemiology & Biostatistics Program, City University of New York School of Public Health and Hunter College, New York, New York, United States of America.
Mahesh M MansukhaniDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Guo-Xia TongDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Carolyn L WesthoffDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledSelf-sampling could increase cervical cancer screening uptake. While methods have been identified for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, to date, self-sampling has not provided adequate specimens for cytology. We piloted the validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cervical cytology and HPV testing. We enrolled 198 women in New York City in 2008-2009 from three ambulatory clinics where they received cervical cancer screening. All were asked to use the Delphi Screener™ to self-lavage 1-3 months after clinician-collected index cytological smear (100 normal; 98 abnormal). Women with abnormal cytology results from either specimen underwent colposcopy; 10 women with normal results from both specimens also underwent colposcopy. We calculated sensitivity of self-collected cytology to detect histologically confirmed high grade lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN, 2+); specificity for histology-negative (CIN 1 or lower), paired cytology negative, or a third cytology negative; and kappa for paired results. One hundred and ninety-seven (99.5%) women self-collected a lavage. Seventy-five percent had moderate to excellent cellularity, two specimens were unsatisfactory for cytology. Seven of 167 (4%) women with definitive results had CIN2+; one had normal and six abnormal cytology results with the self-lavage (sensitivity = 86%, 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 42, 100). The kappa for paired cytology was low (0.36; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.47) primarily due to clinician specimens with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) coded as normal using Screener specimens. However, three cases of HSIL were coded as ASC-US and one as normal using Screener specimens. Seventy-three women had paired high-risk HPV tests with a kappa of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.84). Based on these preliminary findings, a larger study to estimate the performance of the Screener for co-testing cytology and HPV or for HPV testing with cytology triage is warranted.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00702208.

Indexed as

AdultCytodiagnosisDemographyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansNew YorkNew York CityPapillomaviridaePilot ProjectsSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal Douching

Identifiers

PMID24376516
PMCPMC3869665
OpenAlexW1986374782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.