Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24376504›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Development of a multimorbidity illness perceptions scale (MULTIPleS).

Chris J Gibbons, Cassandra Kenning, Peter A Coventry, Penny Bee, Christine Bundy, Louise Fisher, Peter Bower

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Patient-reported outcome measures for patients with chronic comorbidities: a systematic review of psychometric properties.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Measuring treatment burden with the treatment burden questionnaire (TBQ): a narrative literature review and implications for geriatric research and clinical practice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Treatment Burden Among Older Adults in the United States, 2022.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chris J GibbonsNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Greater Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom ; NIHR School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Cassandra KenningNIHR School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Peter A CoventryNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Greater Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom ; NIHR School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Penny BeeSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Christine BundyManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Louise FisherNIHR School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Peter BowerNIHR School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIllness perceptions are beliefs about the cause, nature and management of illness, which enable patients to make sense of their conditions. These perceptions can predict adjustment and quality of life in patients with single conditions. However, multimorbidity (i.e. patients with multiple long-term conditions) is increasingly prevalent and a key challenge for future health care delivery. The objective of this research was to develop a valid and reliable measure of illness perceptions for multimorbid patients.

methodsCandidate items were derived from previous qualitative research with multimorbid patients. Questionnaires were posted to 1500 patients with two or more exemplar long-term conditions (depression, diabetes, osteoarthritis, coronary heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Data were analysed using factor analysis and Rasch analysis. Rasch analysis is a modern psychometric technique for deriving unidimensional and intervally-scaled questionnaires.

resultsQuestionnaires from 490 eligible patients (32.6% response) were returned. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five potential subscales 'Emotional representations', 'Treatment burden', 'Prioritising conditions', 'Causal links' and 'Activity limitations'. Rasch analysis led to further item reduction and the generation of a summary scale comprising of items from all scales. All scales were unidimensional and free from differential item functioning or local independence of items. All scales were reliable, but for each subscale there were a number of patients who scored at the floor of the scale.

conclusionsThe MULTIPleS measure consists of five individual subscales and a 22-item summary scale that measures the perceived impact of multimorbidity. All scales showed good fit to the Rasch model and preliminary evidence of reliability and validity. A number of patients scored at floor of each subscale, which may reflect variation in the perception of multimorbidity. The MULTIPleS measure will facilitate research into the impact of illness perceptions on adjustment, clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in patients with multimorbidity.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessMorbiditySurveys and QuestionnairesComorbidityDemographyFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansLogistic ModelsNomogramsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID24376504
PMCPMC3869652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.