ArticleField methods2013
Implementing Self-collection of Biological Specimens With a Diverse Sample.
Article in Field methods, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Untargeted metabolomics of cervicovaginal fluid in patients with ovarian cancer.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Methodological Development of a Test for Salivary Proteome Analysis Useful in Lung Cancer Screening.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Sociodemographic factors are related to hair sample collection in economically marginalized families.Future science OA · 2024Article
- Article
- The implications of socioeconomic factors on salivary bioscience methodological variables in a large pediatric multi-site study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Foster parent responsiveness and young children's diurnal cortisol production.Developmental psychobiology · 2021Article
- Combining Global Positioning System (GPS) with saliva collection among sexual minority adults: A feasibility study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Putting the flight in "fight-or-flight": Testosterone reactivity to skydiving is modulated by autonomic activation.Biological psychology · 2019Article
- Positive parenting predicts cortisol functioning six years later in young adults.Developmental science · 2017Article
- Article
- Estimation and correlation of salivary calcium, phosphorous, alkaline phosphatase, pH, white spot lesions, and oral hygiene status among orthodontic patients.Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collecting saliva is the most noninvasive way to detect changing levels of cortisol (Adam & Kumari, 2009; Soo-Quee Koh & Choon-Huat Koh, 2007), a stress hormone of interest to behavioral and health scientists, where there are benefits from multiple samples taken over a period of days. Various self-collection strategies have been employed, ranging from treated cards to cotton swabs and passive drool methods. The current study investigates the effectiveness of a variety of reminder techniques in encouraging adherence with procedures requiring 4 samples per day on 3 separate days of passive drool collection among African American and European American young adults. The findings suggest that direct texts were associated with the greatest level of adherence, while phone reminders were most effective when controlling for total number of contacts. Results indicate that both traditional and novel reminder methods can positively influence adherence, even with challenging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.