Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24375532›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2014

ROAMER: roadmap for mental health research in Europe.

Josep Maria Haro, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos, Istvan Bitter, Jacques Demotes-Mainard, Marion Leboyer, Shôn W Lewis, Donald Linszen, Mario Maj, David McDaid, Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Large-Scale Neuroimaging of Mental Illness.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Josep Maria HaroCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de LLobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
José Luis Ayuso-Mateos
Istvan Bitter
Jacques Demotes-Mainard
Marion Leboyer
Shôn W Lewis
Donald Linszen
Mario Maj
David McDaid
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Trevor W Robbins
Gunter Schumann
Graham Thornicroft
Christina Van Der Feltz-Cornelis
Jim Van Os
Kristian Wahlbeck
Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
Til Wykes
Celso Arango
Jerome Bickenbach
Matthias Brunn
Pamela Cammarata
Karine Chevreul
Sara Evans-Lacko
Carla Finocchiaro
Andrea Fiorillo
Anna K Forsman
Jean-Baptiste Hazo
Susanne Knappe
Rebecca Kuepper
Mario Luciano
Marta Miret
Carla Obradors-Tarragó
Grazia Pagano
Szilvia Papp
Tom Walker-Tilley

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the high impact of mental disorders in society, European mental health research is at a critical situation with a relatively low level of funding, and few advances been achieved during the last decade. The development of coordinated research policies and integrated research networks in mental health is lagging behind other disciplines in Europe, resulting in lower degree of cooperation and scientific impact. To reduce more efficiently the burden of mental disorders in Europe, a concerted new research agenda is necessary. The ROAMER (Roadmap for Mental Health Research in Europe) project, funded under the European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme, aims to develop a comprehensive and integrated mental health research agenda within the perspective of the European Union (EU) Horizon 2020 programme, with a translational goal, covering basic, clinical and public health research. ROAMER covers six major domains: infrastructures and capacity building, biomedicine, psychological research and treatments, social and economic issues, public health and well-being. Within each of them, state-of-the-art and strength, weakness and gap analyses were conducted before building consensus on future research priorities. The process is inclusive and participatory, incorporating a wide diversity of European expert researchers as well as the views of service users, carers, professionals and policy and funding institutions.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchMental HealthEuropean UnionHumansMental DisordersEuropehealth prioritiesmental disordersmental health researchwell-being research

Identifiers

PMID24375532
PMCPMC6878332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.